Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5481
Next month in: 03:58:29
Server time: 04:01:30, May 11, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of April 4277

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nationalist Party of Likatonia

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4278

Description[?]:

The Worker's Socialist Party propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Federal Republic of Likatonia.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:25:09, September 24, 2017 CET
FromLikatonian Union of Fascists
ToDebating the Budget proposal of April 4277
MessageWhy do you want the head of government to receive so much money

Date23:58:57, September 24, 2017 CET
FromDemocratic1Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of April 4277
MessageHead of Government shouldn't receive that much money

Date22:31:39, September 25, 2017 CET
FromSocial democratic party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of April 4277
MessageI like everything except from the head of the government part

Date00:31:47, September 26, 2017 CET
FromNationalist Party of Likatonia
ToDebating the Budget proposal of April 4277
MessageThe next spending reform will reduce Head of government budget.

Date00:32:41, September 26, 2017 CET
FromNationalist Party of Likatonia
ToDebating the Budget proposal of April 4277
MessageMight I ask what is the preferred HoG budget? Status Quo?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 24

no
    

Total Seats: 184

abstain
   

Total Seats: 217


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59