We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2192
Details
Submitted by[?]: Gil's Green party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2193
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President of the Commonwealth chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Democractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the 
Gil's Green party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Gil's Green party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Independent Freedom Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Gil's Green party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Democractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the CNT/AFL
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Social Capitalist Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the CNT/AFL
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Democractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Gil's Green party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the CNT/AFL
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:12:21, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2192 |
| Message | That's quite a coalition you have there. How the Independent Freedom Party fits in there I don't know. CNT/AFL and Democratic Socialist Party of Lodamun would lose power in the cabinet if this is passed. |
| Date | 22:26:06, February 27, 2006 CET | From | Conservative People's Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2192 |
| Message | I don't see why the IFP fit in there either. It's also an odd sorting of the votes. The number of posts certainly don't match the number of seats. Obviously the CPP is going to vote no. |
| Date | 02:14:16, February 28, 2006 CET | From | Independent Freedom Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2192 |
| Message | Well as Dr Evil said "someone throw me a freaking bone here"...this is the first time someone inlcluded us in cabinet talks... On the other hand, this is a very inclusive cabinet, unlike most others. My vote of no is no reflection on Gil and his party. Another combination might work better. |
| Date | 03:32:48, February 28, 2006 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2192 |
| Message | Right now I think is a perfect time for an inclusive cabinet. This is the first opportunity we've had in decades where petty bickering and partisanry haven't taken hold of Lodamunian politics and brought consensus to a standstill. Give every party a say, we say. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 38 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 108 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 55 |
| Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
| Random quote: "There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle." - Alexis de Tocqueville |