Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5456
Next month in: 03:08:49
Server time: 08:51:10, March 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Dioskouros | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 2192

Details

Submitted by[?]: Gil's Green party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2193

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:12:21, February 27, 2006 CET
FromLibertarian League
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2192
MessageThat's quite a coalition you have there. How the Independent Freedom Party fits in there I don't know. CNT/AFL and Democratic Socialist Party of Lodamun would lose power in the cabinet if this is passed.

Date22:26:06, February 27, 2006 CET
FromConservative People's Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2192
MessageI don't see why the IFP fit in there either. It's also an odd sorting of the votes. The number of posts certainly don't match the number of seats. Obviously the CPP is going to vote no.

Date02:14:16, February 28, 2006 CET
FromIndependent Freedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2192
MessageWell as Dr Evil said "someone throw me a freaking bone here"...this is the first time someone inlcluded us in cabinet talks... On the other hand, this is a very inclusive cabinet, unlike most others. My vote of no is no reflection on Gil and his party. Another combination might work better.

Date03:32:48, February 28, 2006 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of May 2192
MessageRight now I think is a perfect time for an inclusive cabinet. This is the first opportunity we've had in decades where petty bickering and partisanry haven't taken hold of Lodamunian politics and brought consensus to a standstill. Give every party a say, we say.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 38

no
     

Total Seats: 108

abstain
  

Total Seats: 55


Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

Random quote: "Politics is the art of the possible." - Otto von Bismarck

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70