We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: 100 Seat Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2063
Description[?]:
| To balance power more. Stronger parties will hold more power while weaker parties will hold less power. Thus, effectively shall speed up the political process. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:26:23, June 04, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the 100 Seat Bill |
| Message | ....are you sure you mean BALANCE power? |
| Date | 09:57:12, June 04, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the 100 Seat Bill |
| Message | What can I say? No. Smaller parties are awesome. |
| Date | 13:31:16, June 04, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 100 Seat Bill |
| Message | it would not balance power in any way... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 135 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 351 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 223 |
| Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum. |
| Random quote: “The people's war isn't just a war of destruction, it is also a war of construction. We will build new facilities, new hospitals, new farms. We will seek to improve the lives of the people around us. This struggle will be as costly as the struggle against the bourgeois army, and indeed will be even more damaging to the enemy.” - Comrade X, former Hulstrian politician |