We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: 100 Seat Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2063
Description[?]:
| To balance power more. Stronger parties will hold more power while weaker parties will hold less power. Thus, effectively shall speed up the political process. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:26:23, June 04, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the 100 Seat Bill |
| Message | ....are you sure you mean BALANCE power? |
| Date | 09:57:12, June 04, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the 100 Seat Bill |
| Message | What can I say? No. Smaller parties are awesome. |
| Date | 13:31:16, June 04, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the 100 Seat Bill |
| Message | it would not balance power in any way... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 135 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 351 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 223 |
| Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
| Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw |