Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 00:45:53
Server time: 15:14:06, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): LC73DunMHP | Liu Che | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Decommissioning of Bio-Chemical Weapons Bill 4316

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Union (UF)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4317

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:55:33, December 11, 2017 CET
FromCross Movement
ToDebating the Decommissioning of Bio-Chemical Weapons Bill 4316
MessageMr. Speaker,

The Communists would have us defenceless; is there a particular reason for this?

Edwin Armstrong
Leader of the Movement of the Cross

Date21:09:38, December 11, 2017 CET
From Social Democratic Union (UF)
ToDebating the Decommissioning of Bio-Chemical Weapons Bill 4316
MessageMr. Speaker,

Has the Movement of the Cross forgotten that Luthori has one of the best armies, navies and air forces in the world? As a result, we do not need biological and chemical weapons. Furthermore, for those who do support the possession of weapons that can wipe out millions and destroy the planet, Luthori already has nuclear weapons which are significantly more devastating than bio-chemical weapons so why are they necessary?

For the humanitarians among us, the Communist Party would argue that it is simply inhumane and completely unnecessary to have weapons which, if used, would inflict deaths and suffering on an unimaginable scale. By abolishing our own WMDs we reduce the risk of other countries using them against our citizens. That is a much more logical and effective defence policy.

If your argument is going to be that the possession of WMDs is essential for national defence we Communists would argue that is extremely disrespectful towards our brave women and men in the armed forces who risk their lives for their people. We would like this money to be reinvested to boost their safety and security.

Chester Greerson MID,
General Secretary of the Communist Party of Luthori

Date22:01:56, December 11, 2017 CET
FromCross Movement
ToDebating the Decommissioning of Bio-Chemical Weapons Bill 4316
MessageMr. Speaker,

Luthori, once the hegemon of southern Artania, has been eclipsed in status by our neighbours thanks to years of liberalism, socialism, and republicanism dominating our country against the cries of all true Luthorians. Luthori is, of course, a great country, despite the attempts of the left to change that, and our military should be not one of the best, but the best.

Would the Communists rather, then, that Luthorians be the ones to undergo death and suffering on an unimaginable scale? All of our neighbours are willing to use their weapons for any reason whatsoever - they have stated they are willing to strike us first, and so we must be willing to strike back if we are to defend the Luthorian people.

Edwin Armstrong
Leader of the Movement of the Cross

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 88

no
   

Total Seats: 92

abstain
  

Total Seats: 20


Random fact: Particracy is set in the fictional world of Terra, which mirrors the real world of today and yet is not quite like it.

Random quote: "If men want to oppose war, it is statism that they must oppose." - Ayn Rand

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54