We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: civil marriages
Details
Submitted by[?]: libertarian party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4322
Description[?]:
| we should let everybody marry their lovers |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: Only marriages that comply with religious doctrine are recognised.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:17:33, December 22, 2017 CET | From | National Socialist Alliance | To | Debating the civil marriages |
| Message | How yeudish are you trying to make us |
| Date | 14:10:01, December 22, 2017 CET | From | libertarian party | To | Debating the civil marriages |
| Message | what does this have to do with yeudism? |
| Date | 02:58:15, December 23, 2017 CET | From | Communist Party of Mordusia | To | Debating the civil marriages |
| Message | What's this obsession with Yeuds? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 380 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 368 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "The honest politician is one who, when he is bought, stays bought." - Simon Cameron |