Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5477
Next month in: 01:09:25
Server time: 22:50:34, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): HopesFor | Morman Horthy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Omnibus Federalism Reform Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Iqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2194

Description[?]:

A bill to reform the federal structure of Ikradon, devolving power from the national government to regional and local governments.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:11:17, March 01, 2006 CET
FromIqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi
ToDebating the Omnibus Federalism Reform Act
MessageThe Democratic Federalist League hereby submits its proposals to the National Assembly and for public comment.

Date00:07:18, March 02, 2006 CET
FromIkradonian Faith Party
ToDebating the Omnibus Federalism Reform Act
MessageFirst of all, the IFP welcomes the Democratic Federalist League of Ikradon to the political scene. We appreciate every voice in the decision making process.

We have studied all nine proposals, and have found none to be an example of good policy making. These issues, when devolved to the regional level, would create unfeasible differences between the regions. The IFP supports federalisation when it makes the government's work more efficient. Devolution just for devolution is something we prefer to refrain from.

Date01:13:54, March 02, 2006 CET
FromIqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi
ToDebating the Omnibus Federalism Reform Act
MessageThe DFL thanks the IFP for its warm welcome, and its reaction to these proposals.

In general, the DFL takes the stance that the local government is the most responsive to the people and thus, in a democracy, the most representative of the public will. We welcome a diverse society in which competing visions of what is right manage to coexist in different areas. These two principles are the driving forces behind this legislation.

Let's look at specific points. Why should gambling be limited to private residences or licensed clubs? This limits the amount of commerce a free society can generate. Furthermore, if a town's residents simply do not want to deal with gambling, who is the national government to gainsay them? This would allow for gambling to flourish where it is wanted without troubling those who do not want it. Such diversity is not untenable -- rather, it is eminently workable. Fireworks and smoking fall under the same principle.

On the environment, the DFL is strongly of the opinion that individual communities have the manifest self-interest to keep their own land, water, and air clean, and we would prefer that they do so. Many environmental regulations, however, are overly broad and not applicable to specific situations. The DFL believes that leaving environmental regulation to localities will in fact improve efficiency, by eliminating layers of oversight complexity, and putting the onus of environmental policymaking squarely on those most affected by it -- the community which would be harmed by the pollution, if any occurred.

Finally, on education, the DFL favors letting local school districts choose their curricula. We oppose national curriculum standards because they constrain local school boards from adapting to differing circumstances. The DFL also considers local school districts the best judges of when, and whether, a charter school is needed. For this and all of the above reasons, we urge all interested parties to support this bill.

Date08:27:11, March 02, 2006 CET
FromIqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi
ToDebating the Omnibus Federalism Reform Act
MessageSorry for the unusual speed with which we've brought this to vote; however, we want to be sure it clears the National Assembly before the next elections.

Date22:50:51, March 02, 2006 CET
FromUnderappreciated Party of Ikradon
ToDebating the Omnibus Federalism Reform Act
MessageThe UPI has always favored centralization as such we oppose this measure with great respect to the parties in opposition.
---Stephen Mao, UPI National Chairman

Date23:53:01, March 02, 2006 CET
FromIntellectual Revolution Party
ToDebating the Omnibus Federalism Reform Act
MessageIRP agrees with DFL the regional government sees what goes on in their respective region every day, which makes them best equipped to handle the problems that arise. It is our responsibility to give them the power they need to do so. If I may use an analogy, in the military we give the soldiers on the front lines the best armor and weapons we can because they have to solve the problem, or in their case, fight the fight. I realize the analogy is loose but I'm sure you all get the point. It makes complete sense to let those faced with the problems solve them.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 109

no
     

Total Seats: 401

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation.

    Random quote: "The streets are safe in Philadelphia, it's only the people who make them unsafe." - Frank Rizzo

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 102