We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Energy Privatization Act 4334
Details
Submitted by[?]: Reform Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4335
Description[?]:
We see no need whatsoever for the Government to own energy companies. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Current: Private power stations provide energy for the entire power grid.
Proposed: Private power stations provide energy for the entire power grid.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Current: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Proposed: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 01:25:40, January 17, 2018 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Energy Privatization Act 4334 |
Message | Mr Speaker, We can agree with these. Marquis Elad Weston Leader of the RCP |
Date | 11:39:14, January 17, 2018 CET | From | Luthori People's Party (LPP) | To | Debating the Energy Privatization Act 4334 |
Message | Mr Speaker, The LPP finds it vital that the state keeps control in the energy companies. For security and environmental reasons. |
Date | 23:19:24, January 17, 2018 CET | From | Reform Party | To | Debating the Energy Privatization Act 4334 |
Message | Mr Speaker, How on God's green Earth does state ownership contribute to further security for energy generation? How does it impact environmental reasons? Surely the states involvement in owning or not owning energy companies makes no impact on these factors! Henry Perot, Reform Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 94 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 96 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 10 |
Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
Random quote: "Democracy is in peril." - Ralph Nader (referring to turnout in the 1996 US presidential election) |