Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:11:55
Server time: 18:48:04, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): JourneyKan | Mindus | VojmatDunDSU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nationalisation Costings and Budget Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Communist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4341

Description[?]:

The Trade Unionist & Socialist Coalition propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Federal Republic of Mordusia.

This is a 3 year increase and will be reversed once full compensation is given to current owners.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:38:45, January 28, 2018 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation Costings and Budget Act
MessageThis budget plan will require us to hike taxes on the middle-class on a massive scale. We support increased investment in public services, but this budget costs too much. We won't be supporting this budget.

Date12:10:49, January 28, 2018 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation Costings and Budget Act
MessageWe're not opposed to defence spending increases, it's just that this particular increase would put us in a deficit during a period of economic calm. It's not worth the price

Date20:05:24, January 28, 2018 CET
FromCommunist Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation Costings and Budget Act
MessageNo, it would leave us with 1bn MRD surplus. "Whats the problem with deficits" is something your party said when the left had a strengthened position. Stop "flip-flopping" choose a side and stick to your morals. The bottom line of this debate is that the LP seems to be more interested in maintaining power, than defending their own principles.

Bill Forrest
Leader of the TUSC

Date20:05:24, January 28, 2018 CET
FromCommunist Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation Costings and Budget Act
MessageNo, it would leave us with 1bn MRD surplus. "Whats the problem with deficits" is something your party said when the left had a strengthened position. Stop "flip-flopping" choose a side and stick to your morals. The bottom line of this debate is that the LP seems to be more interested in maintaining power, than defending their own principles.

Bill Forrest
Leader of the TUSC

Date10:14:28, January 29, 2018 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Nationalisation Costings and Budget Act
MessageWe've come to support this budget plan now, as it's the best way to pay for defence nationalization

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 537

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 213


    Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "Take our country back" - Conservative Republican campaign slogan for the 4690 Likatonian election

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 49