We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Saridan base facilities
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union of Progressive Ulama
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2195
Description[?]:
| The government of Saridan has offered 250,000 Saridan dollars for a base in our country, for the purpose of fighting against fascism. If this bill passes, it will authorize construction of a base for Saridan in Kayuratan muhafazah. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:58:48, March 03, 2006 CET | From | Union of Progressive Ulama | To | Debating the Saridan base facilities |
| Message | Here is the foreign minister's response to them: If the government of Saridan wishes to purchase base facilities in our country, we will prepare a location in Kayuratan muhafazah. We are at war, and therefore cannot simply hand over a base to you. Put simply, we can't give up base facilities, we need all bases for our own operations. It will take at least a year to construct a new base for Saridan. I will present a bill to the Grand Majelis to authorize this base construction. I trust that in exchange, you will make port facilities available as needed to Al'Badaran navy ships in your own country. We will not require a base, only docking rights. If you wish, you may in the meantime operate against Unionist positions using Al'Badara government facilities, an offer that has always been available to you. If you are only willing to operate from your own bases, then you will have to wait for the bill to be aproved in the Majelis. As you can appreciate, I am not able myself to grant base facilities without legislative approval. Salim Alghabra Vizier for foreign affairs |
| Date | 13:49:09, March 04, 2006 CET | From | Revolutionary Socialist Council | To | Debating the Saridan base facilities |
| Message | We vote no for this, and further emphasise the Ba'athists offer of a Saridian base in Gharki. We are the true socialists, do not support the regime that pretends to be for the proletariat but is even more dangerous than the Conservatives or the Unionists. |
| Date | 18:24:32, March 04, 2006 CET | From | Al'Badaran Conservative Party | To | Debating the Saridan base facilities |
| Message | Do my ears decieve me? Are the RSP denouncing the government which is headed by the Socialist party andthe Ishtirakiya party as non-true socialist? It is to laugh that you find the BMSP, who allied themselves with the absolute enemy of the marxist theory, to be more socialist. I am voting no as I believe that enough forign troops are present right now in Al'Badara and I find that there is no reason for Saridian troops to be present a to add more anxiety to the problem. |
| Date | 04:27:40, March 05, 2006 CET | From | Majatran Socialist Party | To | Debating the Saridan base facilities |
| Message | We feel the DRPs comments have no grounds. Whilst the Socialist and Ishtirakiya partys are true socialists, their policies are diluted by the DRP and UPU who prefer to pretend they are socialist to attract the working class vote but in the end act against any socialist policies. We have aligned ourselves with parties that stand for the total antithesis of marxism because ironically this is the only way to be able to implement marxist policy. We would rather have the ability to turn Gharki into a soviet while the rest of the nation suffers rather than be part of a government that pays lip service to the peoples problems and ends up destroying the whole nation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 239 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 336 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 175 |
| Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner. |
| Random quote: "A wise ruler ought never to keep faith when by doing so it would be against his interests." - Niccolo Machiavelli |