We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 4352
Details
Submitted by[?]: All Progressive Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4353
Description[?]:
Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the All Progressive Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:41:14, February 22, 2018 CET | From | All Progressive Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4352 |
Message | Mr Speaker, Due to inactivity of possible coalition parties, APP has taken it up to govern all government ministries democratically, transparently and constitutionally. Hon. Esteban Casal APP Parliamentary Representative |
Date | 23:34:06, February 22, 2018 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4352 |
Message | We trust the APP with our country's ministries more than the current Cabinet. It took only one month of NWPG control of the Prime Minister's office for a terrorist attack to occur. Only one month! NWPG participation in the government of our country has been absolutely disastrous in regards to both economic stability and public safety. Juan Pablo Cabal Parliamentary Spokesperson |
Date | 04:17:56, February 23, 2018 CET | From | Peoples Party Of Gaduridos | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4352 |
Message | With all due respect to our fellow parties, the PPG believes that the ministries should not be governed by one party and only one party. While it is agreed the NWPG was a disaster, it makes no sense to entrust the APP with power over all ministries. Ivo Soldoti PPG Parliamentary Spokesperson |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 81 | |||
no | Total Seats: 219 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
Random quote: "We never know the worth of water 'til the well is dry." - Thomas Fuller |