Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 01:18:32
Server time: 06:41:27, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 4352

Details

Submitted by[?]: All Progressive Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4353

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:41:14, February 22, 2018 CET
FromAll Progressive Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4352
MessageMr Speaker,
Due to inactivity of possible coalition parties, APP has taken it up to govern all government ministries democratically, transparently and constitutionally.

Hon. Esteban Casal
APP Parliamentary Representative

Date23:34:06, February 22, 2018 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4352
MessageWe trust the APP with our country's ministries more than the current Cabinet. It took only one month of NWPG control of the Prime Minister's office for a terrorist attack to occur. Only one month! NWPG participation in the government of our country has been absolutely disastrous in regards to both economic stability and public safety.

Juan Pablo Cabal
Parliamentary Spokesperson

Date04:17:56, February 23, 2018 CET
FromPeoples Party Of Gaduridos
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 4352
MessageWith all due respect to our fellow parties, the PPG believes that the ministries should not be governed by one party and only one party. While it is agreed the NWPG was a disaster, it makes no sense to entrust the APP with power over all ministries.

Ivo Soldoti
PPG Parliamentary Spokesperson

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 81

no
   

Total Seats: 219

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

Random quote: "We never know the worth of water 'til the well is dry." - Thomas Fuller

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49