We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Devolution of Cannabis
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Renew
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4358
Description[?]:
| We feel each community should be able to decide if they want cannabis in their communities, not the Federal Government forcing communities to have it. This bill will give communities that choice. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: The use of cannabis is legal.
Current: The use of cannabis is legal.
Proposed: Recreational drug use is regulated by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:36:23, March 05, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Renew | To | Debating the Devolution of Cannabis |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of the Cannabis Devolution bill as it will provide more freedom to the communities that we represent here in Parliament. I myself represent several small town communities in Pernessia who don't want this drug in their communities. Current laws allow local governments to regulate alcohol but not cannabis? That makes little sense and is seemingly contradictory. Cannabis offers contact highs to people who may be in surrounding areas and oftentimes releases of putrid smell that can be smelt for several blocks! It is for these reasons are party feels that this should be decision left to local governments not the federal government Neil Puga SCP Parliamentary Leader |
| Date | 00:43:04, March 05, 2018 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Devolution of Cannabis |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The Progressive Conservatives will wait to hear input from other parties before determining our position on this legislation. We do believe that alcohol and cannabis policies should either both be determined at the national or local level. The current policy in which cannabis legality is determined at the national level and alcohol policy is left to local governments is hypocritical, and we thank the Social Conservatives for pointing this out. Juan Pablo Cabal PCP Parliamentary Spokesperson |
| Date | 16:48:03, March 05, 2018 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the Devolution of Cannabis |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, If SCP moves this to voting, we will support it. Other parties have had ample time to make counterarguments, and PCP has seen none. Juan Pablo Cabal PCP Parliamentary Spokesperson |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 150 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 150 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden. |
| Random quote: "No one today can afford to be innocent, or indulge himself in ignorance of contemporary governments, politics and social orders. The national polities of the modern world maintain their existence by deliberately fostered craving and fear: monstrous protection rackets. The 'free world' has become economically dependent on a fantastic system of stimulation of greed which cannot be fulfilled, sexual desire which cannot be satiated and hatred which has no outlet except against oneself, the persons one is supposed to love, or the revolutionary aspirations of pitiful, poverty-stricken marginal societies like Cuba or Vietnam. The conditions of the Cold War have turned all modern societies - communist included - into vicious distorters of man's true potential." - Gary Snyder |