We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom of Prayer in Schools Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moralist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4379
Description[?]:
| Section 1: Religion has historically played a crucial role in the history of Luthori. In order to protect this culture, teachers shall no longer be restricted from leading students in prayer at public schools. Section 2: Students shall maintain the right to refuse to participate in a prayer service if they disagree with the service, nor shall teachers be required to lead prayers in class. Section 3: Religion and theology classes shall be allowed in public schools, because the current lack thereof, has prevented students from learning about and being open to the beliefs of other cultures, and has created a general religious apathy among the youth population. Section 4: School districts shall not be required to add theology classes as mandatory curriculum, but they shall be allowed to add them as standard curriculum or elective classes as the district sees fit. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy with respect to prayer in schools.
Old value:: Teacher-led prayers in schools are forbidden, except in religious schools.
Current: Teacher-led prayers in schools are encouraged.
Proposed: Teacher-led prayers in schools are encouraged.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 06:01:33, April 15, 2018 CET | From | Moralist Party | To | Debating the Freedom of Prayer in Schools Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I open the floor for debate on this issue. Luke Schiltz Party Chairman, Moralist Party |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 118 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 345 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "An idealist is one who, on noticing that roses smell better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." - H. L. Mencken |