Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:12:59
Server time: 19:47:00, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Strengthening Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: New Republican Front (NRF)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4396

Description[?]:

Tamoria needs to reform some of its military policies.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:17:37, May 19, 2018 CET
From New Republican Front (NRF)
ToDebating the Military Strengthening Act
MessageThe National Republican Front welcomes any suggestions from other parties. It is time we empower our military so as to promote stability throughout Talmoria.

Date17:32:25, May 19, 2018 CET
From National Democratic Party (NDP)
ToDebating the Military Strengthening Act
MessageMariama Darboe, Leader of the Opposition, Chairwoman of the NDP:

The NDP supports a large majority of this bill, however we would like Article 4 to be removed.


Date20:03:42, May 19, 2018 CET
From New Republican Front (NRF)
ToDebating the Military Strengthening Act
MessageUgochukwu Buchi, Chairman of the NRF

The NRF shall remove Article 4 from this bill. We implore other parties to suggest possible add-ons or amendments.

Date02:46:17, May 20, 2018 CET
From United Boroist Cadre
ToDebating the Military Strengthening Act
MessageSareen Bakhtahevda, Minister of Defence:

"This legislation would immediately reverse major goals of the governing coalition. We cannot in good conscience support legislation that would bring back the scourges of land mines and the use of nuclear weapons. We urge the coalition government to reject this piece of legislation in its entirety."

Date02:48:25, May 20, 2018 CET
From Coalition for Talmorian Restoration
ToDebating the Military Strengthening Act
MessageMonika Davidson, Floor Leader for the Progressive Republican Party

"Ladies and gentlemen, it is shameful to see that no matter what accomplishments this body makes there are those among us who still wish to bathe in the blood of our countrymen. Whatever our disagreements with the Congress of Socialists, we share their vision of a peaceful and outward-facing Talmoria. A Talmoria that eschews conquest, imperialism, and war crimes in favor of friendship and harmony. We stand opposed to this act."

Date04:53:43, May 20, 2018 CET
From New Republican Front (NRF)
ToDebating the Military Strengthening Act
MessageUgochukwu Buchi, Chairman of the NRF

"Honorable Talmorians, this bill is to ensure we can adequately defend ourselves in time of great peril. The NRF aren't warmongers or imperialists. Talmoria shouldn't be entangled in conflict unless we are under attack. The time will come when we are being invaded by a force stronger than our own, and when that time comes, how will we be able to defend our Republic? As stated in this bill, landmines, nuclear weapons, and chemical or biological weapons shall be used as a last resort, or at the discretion of our professional military. Again, we emphasize the need for adequate self-defense measures. If this bill doesn't pass, the NRF shall reintroduce a similar one, and will be open to suggestions. We encourage the Black Block and the Front for Motherland and Order to stop abstaining from legislation concerning this great Republic.

Date15:44:53, May 20, 2018 CET
From Black Bloc
ToDebating the Military Strengthening Act
MessageMoniade Richland, leader of the Black Bloc.

Mr Speaker.

We don't need to be urged to do anything. However, so long as this tries to allow for or legitimize the use of chemical weapons- weapons that cannot be controlled and that threaten to indiscriminately kill combantants and civilians alike- then we absolutely and steadfastly refuse to support this legislation.

Believe me, we support fully the building and stockpiling of nuclear arms as a way to safeguard this great nation and her people. But chemical weapons can do us just as much harm- or more- than good. And so while Article 4 remains in this legislation we remain steadfastly opposed.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 184

no
    

Total Seats: 316

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator.

Random quote: "I'm not a leftist; I'm where the righteous ought to be." - M.M. Coady

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73