Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5476
Next month in: 00:52:52
Server time: 15:07:07, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Autokrator30 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Iudicum Maximum: Candidates

Details

Submitted by[?]: Clara Aurora - COSIRA

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 4401

Description[?]:

After the designated period, those are the candidates submitted:

-Genzius Tuccius.

Since 4375 he has acquired extensive experience as a criminal judge, where he has strictly upheld the law of the land. He is responsible for two instances when the offender was sentenced to the death penalty, once in 4376 and once in 4381, just before the abolition of capital punishment. Justice Tuccius continues to subscribes to legal realism, believing that value-free empirical science should serve as the model of judicial rulings, and that law is a practical tool for advancing society's welfare. In his rulings Justice Tuccius tends to emphasize that the purpose of the law is the deterrence of undesirable social consequences, using considerations of fairness and public policy, but devoid of both abstract idealism and textual formalism. He is known to judge more strictly and impose higher punishments when the defendant is wealthier, as a way of setting an example, but he also often imparts the maximum penalties for anti-social behavior like vandalism, loitering, or littering, given that he largely subscribes to the broken window theory. On social issues he is largely of the conservative tradition, but he tends to temper his personal ideological views with his belief that the social consequences of each ruling must be taken into account. As such he has often adopted a more progressive stance on issues such as domestic abuse, abortion, religion, unequal employment, and discrimination.

- Albanus Claudius Midius

Lawyer
Has served two terms in the Senate

- Atia Fredisia

Lawyer and Canon Lawyer
General Counsel to the Factio Aurorianus and Former Executive Director of the Selucians for Religion activist group.

Now, the period of debate and voting shall start. Remember the rules: The Senate shall vote to approve the candidature or not. At least 2/3 of the Selucian parties (3 parties) and 2/3 of the Senators (500 votes) shall vote. A candidate will pass if a single majority is achieved, and will fail in the opposite scenario. If it fails, there is no second chance and Article 99 is immediately activated, which indicates that "if after all the candidates presented have been proposed to the Senate and no one has won the vote of confidence, the members of the Supreme Court shall be given the authority to elect a candidate by themselves". If the Iudicum Maximum refuses to do so, another second voting will be celebrated.

We hope parties can come with a consensus.

Caprenia Belletor,
Minister Iustitia

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:47:57, May 28, 2018 CET
FromFactio Republicana Socialistica
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageSenators,

Before we express on views on the different candidates we would like to know more about the particular views and judicial activities of Hon. Albanus Claudius Midius and Hon. Atia Fredisia.

Decimus Nasennius Valens
Senator

Date21:49:07, May 28, 2018 CET
FromNovus Partis Rexisti
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageMy opinions are as follows;
Centralization
unitarist-leaning
excellent
perfect
Civil Rights
restrictive-leaning
Ecology
skeptic-leaning
Foreign Relations
moderate isolationist
Government Responsibilities
small government-leaning
Market
regulator-leaning
Military
convinced militarist
Morality
conservative-leaning
Religion
religious-leaning

Date21:49:34, May 28, 2018 CET
FromNovus Partis Rexisti
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageAlbanus Claudius Midius
Senator and Praetor of Cor Patriae

Date22:04:39, May 28, 2018 CET
FromFactio Aurorianus
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageSenators,

I come before you today as the Factio Aurorianus Candidate for Iudicum Maximum.

While I have no experience on the bench nor in the Senate I have extensive experience in litigation both in the Aurorian Patriarchal Church and in the Civil Courts of Selucia. After finishing my degree I taught courses in Law and Religion and in Legal Ethics to Law Students. I wrote over 70 articles on Law and Religion where I analyzed the Cases before the Iudicum Maximum and other inferior courts that expounded upon the rights of religious Selucians and the rights of Religions as organizations. I have also written extensively on abortion and have articulated the rights of the unborn that should be recognized by the Court. I am personally a religious conservative but my jurisprudence aligns with legal realism, but on the pragmatic side. That is, I believe in "playing by the rules" and applying the law in an empirically dispassionate way but I also acknowledge that the law "runs out" and judges are left with applying what they think are the philosophical and ethical principals of those who are affected by the law.

After teaching and performing scholarly functions for a number of years I left academia and started the Selucians For Religion Center. At this Center I directed pro-bono litigation for religious organization and Selucians attempting to vindicate their rights in the Courts. I argued eight times before the Iudicum Maximum and many times at inferior appellate courts. At the Center I had 75 attorneys working under me and also directed the Center's Fundraising activities.


I left the Center last year to become the General Counsel of the Factio Aurorianus. I have not begun any litigation on their behalf but I have handled their campaign finance and Election Law needs.


I am available to answer any more questions if need be.


Atia Fredisia

Date00:46:47, May 29, 2018 CET
FromNovus Partis Rexisti
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageSenators,

Shall we vote on the candidates now?

Augustus Scipio Longidium
Senator

Date17:02:47, May 29, 2018 CET
FromClara Aurora - COSIRA
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageIn Marea-Civis Sinistram abstains from this moment.

Alanus Scaro
Orator of IMCS

Date23:29:32, May 29, 2018 CET
FromClara Aurora - COSIRA
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageOOC: Rather than a yes-no vote, we should simply say which candidate receives the votes of our own parties

Date01:26:04, May 30, 2018 CET
FromNovus Partis Rexisti
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageThe Rexist Party votes for Hon. Midius.

Date07:38:35, May 30, 2018 CET
FromFactio Republicana Socialistica
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageThe Republican Party votes for Hon. Tuccius.

Date17:26:09, May 30, 2018 CET
FromFactio Aurorianus
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageSenators,

Given the turmoil that embroiled this government and the agitations for new elections, we deem that it would be immoral to vote on something so permanent a position. We demand that the Casear table this decision until the next election.

Fr. Ambrose

Date19:48:43, May 30, 2018 CET
FromFactio Renatus Seluciana
ToDebating the Iudicum Maximum: Candidates
MessageWe agree with Factio Aurorianus.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 413

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 291


    Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum!

    Random quote: "The only difference between the Republican and Democratic parties is the velocities with which their knees hit the floor when corporations knock on their door. That's the only difference." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 67