Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 01:53:29
Server time: 22:06:30, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): burgerboys | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | HopesFor | JourneyJak | luthorian3059 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Provincial Regulation of Engagment in Positive Discrimination (PREP'D) Act of 4401

Details

Submitted by[?]: New Liberal Party of Hutori

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4401

Description[?]:

This Bill would allow localities to decide on positive discrimination/affirmative action policies.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:45:32, May 30, 2018 CET
FromFederal Heritage Party of Hutori
ToDebating the Provincial Regulation of Engagment in Positive Discrimination (PREP'D) Act of 4401
MessageMr. Speaker,

We cannot open the door to the possibility of such blatantly racist policies. We must maintain an atmosphere of meritocracy in order to have the best society possible. Enforcing quotas will only perpetuate equality of outcome and will do nothing to promote equality of opportunity.

Henry Sowell (F-RO)
Federalist Trade & Industry Critic

Date01:51:24, June 01, 2018 CET
FromHutori Party
ToDebating the Provincial Regulation of Engagment in Positive Discrimination (PREP'D) Act of 4401
MessageMr Speaker,

The Royalist Party fully agrees with the Federalist Party on this issue. No form of discrimination is acceptable. We will not support any bill which seeks to change this law.

Brett Martin
MP for Wrightstown
Chairman of the Royalist Party Conservative Caucus

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 176

no
    

Total Seats: 229

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "If we cannot, by reason, by influence, by example, by strenuous effort, and by personal sacrifice, mend the bad places of civilization, we certainly cannot do it by force." - Auberon Herbert

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48