We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Provincial Regulation of Engagment in Positive Discrimination (PREP'D) Act of 4401
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Liberal Party of Hutori
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4401
Description[?]:
This Bill would allow localities to decide on positive discrimination/affirmative action policies. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Positive discrimination.
Old value:: No form of positive discrimination is permitted.
Current: The government encourages positive discrimination and enforces it for government hiring.
Proposed: Hiring policies are regulated by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:45:32, May 30, 2018 CET | From | Federal Heritage Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Provincial Regulation of Engagment in Positive Discrimination (PREP'D) Act of 4401 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, We cannot open the door to the possibility of such blatantly racist policies. We must maintain an atmosphere of meritocracy in order to have the best society possible. Enforcing quotas will only perpetuate equality of outcome and will do nothing to promote equality of opportunity. Henry Sowell (F-RO) Federalist Trade & Industry Critic |
Date | 01:51:24, June 01, 2018 CET | From | Hutori Party | To | Debating the Provincial Regulation of Engagment in Positive Discrimination (PREP'D) Act of 4401 |
Message | Mr Speaker, The Royalist Party fully agrees with the Federalist Party on this issue. No form of discrimination is acceptable. We will not support any bill which seeks to change this law. Brett Martin MP for Wrightstown Chairman of the Royalist Party Conservative Caucus |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 176 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 229 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "If we cannot, by reason, by influence, by example, by strenuous effort, and by personal sacrifice, mend the bad places of civilization, we certainly cannot do it by force." - Auberon Herbert |