We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Freedom of Body Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4422
Description[?]:
| The PSP is of the opinion that we are too restrictive in our country on the issue of nakedness. A body is a body, and one should be able to have the freedom to show it. To that extent, we also find the ban on sex in public restrictive. It is all just nature, and we should not penalize people for such acts John Brown PSP MP |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Current: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:42:39, July 09, 2018 CET | From | Secular Humanist Party | To | Debating the The Freedom of Body Act |
| Message | The Secular Humanist Party agrees with the PSP. Without being a detriment to society there is no reason to prohibit anything; this includes public nudity and sexual acts in public. The burden of proof of why this should be illegal is with those in favour of the law, those that believe public nudity and public shows of affection are a problem. Alexander Prince Leader of the Secular Humanist Party |
| Date | 17:46:23, July 09, 2018 CET | From | Lodamun Labour Party | To | Debating the The Freedom of Body Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The LLP supports the current restrictions, but we can see that people think differently about this. We want to propose a alternative. The LLP is willing to support this bill if they are changed to letting the local government decide on these matters. Ilona DeVos LLP MP |
| Date | 17:51:09, July 09, 2018 CET | From | Liberal Progressives | To | Debating the The Freedom of Body Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We of the Liberal Progressives support this bill, since it allows people greater personal freedom. Zoey Rosefield, Leader of the Liberal Progressives |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 384 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 215 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The voters enjoy active parties who take upon themselves the initiative to create laws. |
| Random quote: "Because we don't think about future generations, they will never forget us." - Henrik Tikkanen |