We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: No First Strike Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4428
Description[?]:
| We propose amending government legislation on the following to allow for retaliation in the event of a first strike against Lodamun. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:08:05, July 21, 2018 CET | From | Conservative Democratic Union Lodamun | To | Debating the No First Strike Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The Conservative Democrats are in favor of this way of using nuclear and biological weapons. Andrejanovski Seehofer MP on Defence Conservative Democratic Union Lodamun |
| Date | 21:39:49, July 21, 2018 CET | From | Lodamun Labour Party | To | Debating the No First Strike Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, This bill doesn't go far enough in the eyes of the LLP. For this reason we have put forward our own proposal as part of the Military Act VI. Not to mention that this bill doesn't make sense, the current law prevents us from building chemical and nuclear weapons, if we can't produce we can't use! This bill includes no proposals for production of chemical and nuclear weapons. Gorden Hawk LLP MP on Defence |
| Date | 11:15:59, July 22, 2018 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the No First Strike Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The LLP are right to point out that this putting the horse before the cart (or the other way round). Currently we cannot use the aforementioned weapon systems, we have no need to. However we can research such systems. Therefore it would not tak a massive step to go from research to production and this proposal would already establish the rules for using such systems. Francis Young Republican leader |
| Date | 13:21:35, July 22, 2018 CET | From | Lodamun Labour Party | To | Debating the No First Strike Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The RP is talking around my point. This bill is incomplete, if we do not have nuclear weapons we can't use nuclear weapons. Gorden Hawk LLP MP on Defence |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 268 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 327 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
| Random quote: "Too bad all the people who know how to run the country are busy driving taxi cabs and cutting hair." - George Burns |