We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: An Eye for an Eye bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social-Libertarian Alorian Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2201
Description[?]:
This sounds weird, but the SLAP is thinking of the old-testamental quote "an eye for an eye" here. You do not want to be attacked by B&C weapons so do not attack. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:14:53, March 15, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the An Eye for an Eye bill |
Message | An eye for an eye wll just leave us all blind... |
Date | 23:14:57, March 15, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the An Eye for an Eye bill |
Message | An eye for an eye wlll just leave us all blind... |
Date | 04:39:53, March 16, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the An Eye for an Eye bill |
Message | AGSP: Isn't this a little more pacifist than using it for any reason, though? |
Date | 12:47:28, March 16, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the An Eye for an Eye bill |
Message | Fair point.. It's just that SLAP's justification is a bit misjudged... |
Date | 23:03:24, March 16, 2006 CET | From | Social-Libertarian Alorian Party | To | Debating the An Eye for an Eye bill |
Message | Well, the real intention was: Don't hit in order not the be hit. |
Date | 01:39:17, March 17, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the An Eye for an Eye bill |
Message | I'm convinced by thye ICP- thank you. |
Date | 16:53:25, March 17, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Liberal Party | To | Debating the An Eye for an Eye bill |
Message | We're in favour of this. |
Date | 22:28:54, March 17, 2006 CET | From | Aloria Green Socialist Party | To | Debating the An Eye for an Eye bill |
Message | How close was that!? |
Date | 23:32:10, March 17, 2006 CET | From | Independent Capitalist Party | To | Debating the An Eye for an Eye bill |
Message | 299 to 301 is close, we almost voted for this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 299 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 301 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum! |
Random quote: "It is never too late to give up our prejudices." - Henry David Thoreau |