Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 03:56:13
Server time: 12:03:46, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): dannypk19 | echizen | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Freedom and Secularism Act 4471

Details

Submitted by[?]: Trade Union and Socialist Coalition

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4475

Description[?]:

A bill to extend personal freedom and transform Luthori into a more Democratic and Secular society

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:18:25, October 20, 2018 CET
FromHosian Democratic Union
ToDebating the Freedom and Secularism Act 4471
MessageOOC: So, we dont actually mind engaging in RP on this and even debating, but a mixed issue 18 proposal bill like this will have a lot of us abstaining since these are major changes that will cause implications for even the LDP. If I were you, I would go on discord (add Ovarix#3328) as we are arranging a cabinet. In the current form though, this is sort of a bill that most of us like to avoid (we dub these "visibility" bills). We would even vote on some compromise version of this, but some of these are just extreme secular and some of these are just an undoing of fascist legislation (which we to some degree do support).

Date13:38:23, October 21, 2018 CET
FromTrade Union and Socialist Coalition
ToDebating the Freedom and Secularism Act 4471
MessageOOC): If people don't like a bill they can vote for or vote against. We are perfectly entitled to introduce an act like this. It mainly is a visibility bill though

Date19:46:27, October 24, 2018 CET
FromHosian Democratic Union
ToDebating the Freedom and Secularism Act 4471
MessageOOC: By voting "no", it will damage some positions and shift them. By voting "yes", it will improve some positions, and damage others. This is why I *never* do visibility bills, its unfair to other parties. The parties required to vote for this would be getting hurt un-necessarily. For example, White Rose would love to liberalize the courts, but they want a state religion. This would turn them into a secular party at the expense of some reforms they would otherwise want.

Date19:47:16, October 24, 2018 CET
FromHosian Democratic Union
ToDebating the Freedom and Secularism Act 4471
MessageBasically, this bill says "either be a religious fascist or a secular person"

Date17:56:26, October 25, 2018 CET
FromHosian Democratic Union
ToDebating the Freedom and Secularism Act 4471
MessageOOC: Other parties are encouraged to abstain if it damages their positions.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 152

no
  

Total Seats: 86

abstain
    

Total Seats: 207


Random fact: Whilst the use of non-English languages can be appropriate for nation names, party names, constitutional titles and other variables, English is the official language of communication in the game. All descriptive texts and public communications should be in English or at least appear alongside a full English translation.

Random quote: "Politics is the art of postponing decisions until they are no longer relevant." - Henri Queuille

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 136