We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Treaty Withdrawal Act of 4516
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriotic League
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4517
Description[?]:
| We are the only ones in these treaties. No reason to be the only ones following them. |
Proposals
Article 1
Withdraw from the Abolition of Nuclear Weapons Treaty.
Article 2
Withdraw from the Anti Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:38:22, January 16, 2019 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal Act of 4516 |
| Message | We support withdrawing from any single nation treaties, even though the provisions within these treaties are supported by our party. |
| Date | 23:39:03, January 16, 2019 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal Act of 4516 |
| Message | To make it clear, we won't support legalizing any of these types of weapons. |
| Date | 00:09:42, January 17, 2019 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal Act of 4516 |
| Message | We keep withdrawing from treaties, but right now, requiring two votes on them is the only thing that keeps a bare majority of two seats from passing laws which allow us to have nuclear weapons. Those weapons are horrific and there is a second reason to have treaties: To make it difficult for a bare majority to willy nilly pass legislation that puts us onto a horrific and immoral path, like they so desperately want to do. We urge ALL Parties to defend these treaties. |
| Date | 00:10:25, January 17, 2019 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal Act of 4516 |
| Message | The lifting of these treaties would mean paving the way of regressive factions to propose to legalize these legislations,we shall not provide the two-thirds so that two-thirds will not be achieved if someone tries to repeal these treaties to actually change these legislations in the future (which is what the PL wish to be done) |
| Date | 00:17:00, January 17, 2019 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal Act of 4516 |
| Message | We thank the Liberals for their conscientious vote for peace and freedom from these monstrous weapons of mass destruction. |
| Date | 00:18:10, January 17, 2019 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal Act of 4516 |
| Message | We would add: Since the abolition of nuclear weapons treaty is redundant to the Kalistani Anti NBC treaty, we would support repeal of that one only, if we could keep the Anti-NBC treaty. |
| Date | 00:39:48, January 17, 2019 CET | From | National Conservative Party | To | Debating the Treaty Withdrawal Act of 4516 |
| Message | We believe SPoK has brought up a great a point, the Patriotic League is far too powerful to risk allowing them to legalize these horrific weapons. In the future though, we'll try to remove these one nation treaties, but right now it's far too dangerous. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 56 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 194 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663 |
| Random quote: "He who will not economize will have to agonize." - Confucius |