We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Hosian Democratic Alliance Banning Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Faschistische Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4547
Description[?]:
| By passage of this act the HDA and all its successor Organisation will be banned in Solentia, because of various violations againts the law while in government, undermining the constitution of Solentia and the complete destruction of constitutional safeguards for the People like the Human Rights Charta. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:52:19, March 18, 2019 CET | From |  Hosian Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Hosian Democratic Alliance Banning Act |
| Message | Uh oh! |
| Date | 16:11:09, March 18, 2019 CET | From | Faschistische Union | To | Debating the Hosian Democratic Alliance Banning Act |
| Message | Another reason is the continuing unparlamentarian languange used in this debate: http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=596334 "Ah, the BdL's poodle barks once more! Instead of yapping at your master's feet why don't you do some research. We are the only party to actually try and use the Court and your master is currently blocking the process. The law, like all BdL 'extra' laws, was written to ensure that no other party could gain control. Oops, looks like that failed! The charge that we illegally employed anyone is false, women were legally allowed to work throughout our time in government and we have extended those rights. Weren't the DCP the party proven to be drunk while in office? Best have another snifter old bean, calm your nerves." |
| Date | 16:16:10, March 18, 2019 CET | From | Hosian Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Hosian Democratic Alliance Banning Act |
| Message | Double uh oh! We'll have to start acting in a more honourable fashion. How is that done again? Bündnis der Liberalkonservativen Message Some parties seem to be butthurt. http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=595931 |
| Date | 16:21:14, March 18, 2019 CET | From | Faschistische Union | To | Debating the Hosian Democratic Alliance Banning Act |
| Message | There is a grave difference between the Statement of the Party and ours: We were suggesting they, repeatedly and massivly attacked another Party. This is something we should not accept in Solentia even though we might diasgree. |
| Date | 16:24:57, March 18, 2019 CET | From | Faschistische Union | To | Debating the Hosian Democratic Alliance Banning Act |
| Message | *We were suggesting, while the HDA massivly and repeatedly attacked another Party. We think that we cannot tolerate that, especially because the HDA MP attacked another MP personally. Fraction spokesman. |
| Date | 16:30:04, March 18, 2019 CET | From | Hosian Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the Hosian Democratic Alliance Banning Act |
| Message | Personally and accurately. 'I believe that Caelan S Bromell May have had a drink or 2 when submitting the last comment so apologies to all parties there.'- Sir Drew Layton Lewstone, President of DCP http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=596067 I think you were just randomly abusing others. |
| Date | 17:45:50, March 18, 2019 CET | From | Faschistische Union | To | Debating the Hosian Democratic Alliance Banning Act |
| Message | 😂😂By personally we also refer to other parties....🤦🏻♂️ |
| Date | 19:07:18, March 18, 2019 CET | From | Liberal Party | To | Debating the Hosian Democratic Alliance Banning Act |
| Message | Why BDL support president candidate from HDA if you want to ban everything from HDA. Does your party didnt have good president candidate, or you think you dont win on election? I am just wonder. Jovicic N. |
| Date | 08:12:50, March 19, 2019 CET | From | Faschistische Union | To | Debating the Hosian Democratic Alliance Banning Act |
| Message | We did not hear such a contemptous from the President as yet and therefore have no reason to believe he Supports such a Statement. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 47 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 42 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 11 |
| Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
| Random quote: "In public policy, it matters less who has the best arguments and more who gets heard, and by whom." - Ralph Reed |