We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Acte du Conseil de sécurité du Congrès mondial 4553
Details
Submitted by[?]: Parti Conservateur Royaliste
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4554
Description[?]:
| World Congress Security Council Act 4553 *** Loi visant à modifier les votes du Royaume de Kanjor pour le Conseil de sécurité du Congrès mondial *** An Act to change the votes of the Royaume de Kanjor for the Security Council of the World Congress |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nomination for Security Council Seat A. (For more information, see )
http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453http
Old value:: Hobrazia
Current: Dorvik
Proposed: Abstain
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:19:04, April 01, 2019 CET | From |  Parti Socialiste Kanjorien | To | Debating the Acte du Conseil de sécurité du Congrès mondial 4553 |
| Message | Dear colleagues, While the Luthorian regime does not fully conform to the ideals we'd like to see represented in the security council, this is a remarkably better choice than the current nominee. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 400 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
| Random quote: "Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end." - John Dalberg-Acton |