We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Clear the Air Act (take 2)
Details
Submitted by[?]: F.O.R.W.A.R.D.
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2208
Description[?]:
To outlaw the horrible scourge of carcinogens in our public air. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards smoking.
Old value:: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner, and is legal in government-owned buildings.
Current: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner, but is illegal in government-owned buildings.
Proposed: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in places of employment, with the exception of places that primarily serve liquor.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Sale of tobacco products.
Old value:: There are no regulations on the sale of tobacco.
Current: Only adults may purchase tobacco.
Proposed: There are certain restrictions on the sale of tobacco and only adults may purchase tobacco.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:46:05, March 29, 2006 CET | From | Parti Communiste Soviétique | To | Debating the Clear the Air Act (take 2) |
Message | Split this up. 1 - no 2 - yes. |
Date | 20:53:12, March 29, 2006 CET | From | F.O.R.W.A.R.D. | To | Debating the Clear the Air Act (take 2) |
Message | Hah. The manifesto writer wishes that I break this up? What, may I ask, is your problem with proposal 1? |
Date | 21:52:22, March 30, 2006 CET | From | Parti Communiste Soviétique | To | Debating the Clear the Air Act (take 2) |
Message | If article 2 is passed I see no need for article 1. Plus, my manifesto was not about being passed etc, it was mainly for our visibility. |
Date | 21:54:13, March 30, 2006 CET | From | F.O.R.W.A.R.D. | To | Debating the Clear the Air Act (take 2) |
Message | The need for article 1 is so that people can breathe clean air in public spaces. Do you really want your colleague "lighting up" right next to you at work all day? You do know the risks of secondhand smoke, don't you? |
Date | 22:06:38, March 30, 2006 CET | From | Parti Communiste Soviétique | To | Debating the Clear the Air Act (take 2) |
Message | "Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner" People ought to be responsible enough to decide for themselves, if they think you should be allowed to smoke then why not, but the majority will ban it anyway. I just feel it's unnecessary regulation. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 213 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 414 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Hundreds of vessels were lost while traversing the cold waters of the Sea of Lost Souls. It is located between Seleya and Majatra. |
Random quote: "Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance." - H. L. Mencken |