We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Child Labour Legalization
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian Democratic Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2208
Description[?]:
| an Act to legalize limited Child Labour |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning child labour.
Old value:: Child labour is forbidden.
Current: Child labour is allowed and it is subjected to the same regulations as adult labour.
Proposed: Child labour is allowed, but with additional regulations to those of adult labourers.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:42:18, March 30, 2006 CET | From | Labor Party | To | Debating the Child Labour Legalization |
| Message | This is an absolute abomination. Right-Wing scum |
| Date | 18:24:05, March 30, 2006 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Child Labour Legalization |
| Message | This swill cause more children from working class families and poor families to take work, and that will cause their education to suffer. The only work children should be allowed to do is a paper round, acting and modeling (of children's clothes or toys for shopping catalogues) However I do think that having a 11 year old tea boy/girl in an office is a good thing. This will also be a risk to undermiming the minimum wage, unless the children are entitled to the minimum wage too. |
| Date | 20:48:23, March 30, 2006 CET | From | Christian Democratic Union | To | Debating the Child Labour Legalization |
| Message | Children have MORE regulation than adults. If I was rightwing scum, I'd be trying to make it less regulated than adult. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 184 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 132 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 234 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?" - Mahatma Gandhi. |