We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cultural Heritage Protection
Details
Submitted by[?]: Socialist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4601
Description[?]:
| At the CPL, we think that the government should actively protect our cultural heritage with a public agency. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National, cultural and historic sites and monuments.
Old value:: The state encourages and funds private efforts towards the protection of cultural and historical heritage.
Current: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Proposed: The state actively protects scenery, localities, cultural, and historical sites; it maintains an agency to preserve them untouched if public interest so requires.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:26:03, July 04, 2019 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Cultural Heritage Protection |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We do this but it does not need a Government agency. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 421 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 140 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 39 |
| Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: "Usually the nonsense liberals spout is kind of cute, but in wartime their instinctive idiocy is life-threatening." - Ann Coulter |