We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: OL LPL-2 Defense Reform Act 4614/3
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Party of Lodamun - Liberals
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 4615
Description[?]:
| An Act to improve the defensive capabilities of the Lodamese Defence Forces to ensure the maintenance of domestic and foreign security and of the rule of law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change National military policy.
Old value:: The government retains a part time, professional army, navy and air force in alignment with paramilitary groups
Current: The nation retains a full time, professional army, navy and air force.
Proposed: The nation retains a full time, professional army, navy and air force.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Current: The nation shall never produce or store nuclear weaponry for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:09:45, August 06, 2019 CET | From | Lodamese Democratic Progressive Party | To | Debating the OL LPL-2 Defense Reform Act 4614/3 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, While we agree with the military policy article, we cannot agree with the one on nuclear weaponry. In its current state, we would vote against this bill. In respect with the former: we can agree on the need for a full-time professional military, though feel the need to bring up that our current outline of the military(http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=599448) includes alignment with paramilitary groups. Roland Moore, LGC Social Democratic Faction Leader |
| Date | 02:28:59, August 06, 2019 CET | From | Progressive Party of Lodamun - Liberals | To | Debating the OL LPL-2 Defense Reform Act 4614/3 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Although the Liberal Party accepts the LGC's opposition to the production and use of nuclear weaponry, we believe it is important to put the defence and security of Lodamun above moral consideration. Lodamun deserves the most capable fighting force available that can defend its interests. Therefore we will continue to advocate for the legality of future military nuclear research, as well as a move away from the backwards outlook taken towards the military by the previous administrations; especially the part-time nature of our current Defence Force. Edward Clarke Leader of the Liberal Party |
| Date | 07:34:25, August 06, 2019 CET | From | Prince-Republican League - New EAPP | To | Debating the OL LPL-2 Defense Reform Act 4614/3 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The more religiously-minded wing of EAPP would like to voice their considerable excitement on the topic of nuclear potency for assorted spiritual reasons and the rest of the EAPP has decided to follow their lead. Lurich Eugen Dragna, Head of the EAPP Council of Shamans |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 164 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 435 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Voters have an extra appreciation for bills that actually get passed, so if you want to maximally take profit from your votes, make sure you compromise with others. |
| Random quote: "I believe that guns don't kill people, husbands that come home early do." - Larry the Cable Guy |