We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: How to destroy the moral fabric of society
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2209
Description[?]:
| 1. Vote for this bill 2. Rinse, repeat |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Current: All abortions are illegal.
Proposed: Abortion is allowed during the entire course of the pregnancy.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning adoption.
Old value:: Adoption policy is to be established by local governments.
Current: Adoption is strictly regulated by the government. Only by passing several tests and by following an intensive program applicants can adopt children.
Proposed: Adoption is not regulated.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: Local governments may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Current: Local governments may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: No curfew policies may be established.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Libel laws.
Old value:: Individuals may sue over falsehoods printed on them.
Current: Individuals may sue over falsehoods printed on them.
Proposed: The nation has no laws regarding libel.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding regulation of media content.
Old value:: There are laws against the publication of false information; everything else may be published freely.
Current: It is forbidden to criticize the government, or publish any material that the government does not approve of.
Proposed: There are no content regulations; the media may publish anything, even proven falsehoods.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: The government has the right to monitor information of individuals without letting them know.
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Article 7
Proposal[?] to change Slander laws.
Old value:: Individuals may sue over malicious falsehoods spoken about them.
Current: Individuals may sue over falsehoods and defamatory opinions spoken about them, if judged to be malicious.
Proposed: The nation has no laws regarding slander.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:34:16, April 02, 2006 CET | From |   Pnték Znkak Prta 'Bastardry' | To | Debating the How to destroy the moral fabric of society |
| Message | The Bastards severely hope that the NWP are sending this to vote to vote against it in tried and tested form. (Furthermore, we find the description hilarious. Oron, you comedy genius you. XD ) |
| Date | 15:29:28, April 02, 2006 CET | From | Fight For Your Right To Party | To | Debating the How to destroy the moral fabric of society |
| Message | I hope that the NWP are sending this to vote and voting for it. |
| Date | 16:03:05, April 02, 2006 CET | From | Pnték Znkak Prta 'Bastardry' | To | Debating the How to destroy the moral fabric of society |
| Message | So you're for the publication of proven fallacies and and slander? Deplorable. |
| Date | 19:16:07, April 02, 2006 CET | From | Pnték Prsakij Prta (Phalangists) | To | Debating the How to destroy the moral fabric of society |
| Message | Whats wrong with that? I am pretty sure that court cases raised against those who use untruths would soon lead to to a stop. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 123 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 124 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 46 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
| Random quote: "You know what's interesting about Washington? It's the kind of place where second-guessing has become second nature." - George W. Bush |