We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The cultural expenses reform bill.
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Democratic People's Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4644
Description[?]:
This bill aims at preserving our brilliant artists and library's but makes sure they are not reliant on the government and will let the private sector be more efficient, and that we don't waste money. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Art subsidies
Old value:: The government subsidises artistic institutions and all artists.
Current: The government only subisdises art that is religious in nature.
Proposed: The government subsidises artistic institutions such as art schools and galleries, but does not subsidise individual artists.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the funding of libraries.
Old value:: The national government controls a vast and comprehensive system of public libraries.
Current: Funding and operation of libraries is left entirely to local governments.
Proposed: The national government contracts with private companies to maintain a system of libraries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:01:54, October 03, 2019 CET | From | Paleoconservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the The cultural expenses reform bill. |
Message | No, the first one bad |
Date | 18:02:04, October 03, 2019 CET | From | Paleoconservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the The cultural expenses reform bill. |
Message | You should had put it in a case by case basis |
Date | 18:02:27, October 03, 2019 CET | From | Paleoconservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the The cultural expenses reform bill. |
Message | Individuals might be good, the case by casis helps cuz some deserve, some not, govt can pick what artists and stuff to subsidize |
Date | 18:02:41, October 03, 2019 CET | From | Paleoconservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the The cultural expenses reform bill. |
Message | in rest is fine |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 535 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 215 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
Random quote: "When there's a single thief, it's robbery. When there are a thousand thieves, it's taxation. " -Vanya Cohen |