Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 00:43:09
Server time: 03:16:50, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): dnobb | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of September 4702

Details

Submitted by[?]: White Rose

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 4703

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:22:33, January 29, 2020 CET
FromLiberal Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 4702
MessageMr. Speaker,

We would support this cabinet.

I yield,
Benedict Lowe,
Member of the People's Council, Fort William

Date01:22:46, January 29, 2020 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 4702
MessageMe Speaker,

We believe this represents a fair distribution based on seats and allows for a strong majority of like-minded parties.

It is the people of Luthori who have rejected communism outright.

Date01:30:11, January 29, 2020 CET
FromLiberal Democratic Party 🌄
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 4702
MessageMr Speaker,

We support this cabinet as we see it as being the beginning of a great revolution for Luthori against the communist tide.

Mason Temple,
Political Leader
Liberal Democratic Party
MP, Fort William West

Date05:54:26, January 29, 2020 CET
FromRight Wing Conservative Party of Luthori
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 4702
MessageDear Mr. Speaker

We also support this cabinet as a very important step against communism.

Andrew Chamberlain
Leader of the RWCPL

Date02:50:41, January 30, 2020 CET
FromRed Party of Luthori
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 4702
MessageMr. Speaker,
How dare you call yourselves "Liberal democrats" while promoting a fascist, sexist, monarchist party.

Date11:31:36, January 30, 2020 CET
FromSocialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 4702
MessageMr. Speaker,
Our colleagues are right. The conservative right keeps destroying our country and making the poor people pay the price for their liberal economic policies!

Date13:32:32, January 30, 2020 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of September 4702
MessageMr Speaker,

The communists devastated this country over 3 years and we welcome the end to their involvement in Government.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 58

no
  

Total Seats: 30

abstain
 

Total Seats: 2


Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law.

Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73