We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Proposal from the Lowing of the Sales Tax on Luxury Goods
Details
Submitted by[?]: Left for Progress
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4730
Description[?]:
| ESSENCE OF THE PROPOSAL Now just the rich people's have luxury goods. We want luxury goods for the simple people! We have to low the sales tax on luxury goods. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Sales tax on luxury goods.
Old value:: 25
Current: 21
Proposed: 20
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:46:28, March 23, 2020 CET | From | Common Wealth Party - CWP | To | Debating the Proposal from the Lowing of the Sales Tax on Luxury Goods |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We won't vote for this because of Article II. And on Article I should be first a debate before a vote will be held. Aida Bat-Elle MP Leader of the CWP |
| Date | 19:51:10, March 23, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Proposal from the Lowing of the Sales Tax on Luxury Goods |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We agree with idea of the debate from the Article 1. We create a bill just with the Article 1 and the debate will be held. Respectfully: Xander Fletcher, the Communication Director and the Temporary Supreme Second-delegate of the Left for Progress Party. |
| Date | 20:44:38, March 23, 2020 CET | From | Socialist Party | To | Debating the Proposal from the Lowing of the Sales Tax on Luxury Goods |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, It is surprising from a party calling itself "Left for Progress" to propose such an anti-social change. The best way to help the simple people is to increase the social security budget, increase the minimum wage and not decrease luxury goods tax rates and letting very rich people buying their useless luxurious goods while the poor people still have to work 7-8 hours a day for low salaries. |
| Date | 20:55:29, March 23, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Proposal from the Lowing of the Sales Tax on Luxury Goods |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We are a characteristic moderate left-wing party. Your opinion is the anti-egalitarian. If we don't low the sales tax for luxury goods, then the simple peoples never can buy luxury goods. We propose or support the social security budget, minimum wage too. Furthermore we fight for basic income and free health care too. Respectfully: Xander Fletcher, the Communication Director and Temporary Supreme Second-delegate of the Left for Progress. |
| Date | 22:59:34, March 23, 2020 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Proposal from the Lowing of the Sales Tax on Luxury Goods |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We abolished VAT to help the poor, we increased this tax to help fund our programmes, we continue to believe a 25% luxury tax is acceptable and proportionate. |
| Date | 23:19:53, March 23, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Proposal from the Lowing of the Sales Tax on Luxury Goods |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, There is a gold necklace in the jeweler. There is 500.000 LPD. There is a luxury good. There is 125.000 LPD the sales tax on that necklace with 25%. 125.000 LPD! This money is equal with the payment for a month of a factory worker. Just the sales tax... You think this is acceptable and proportionate? Respectfully: Xander Fletcher, the Communication Director and Temporary Supreme Second-delegate of the Left for Progress. |
| Date | 23:23:43, March 23, 2020 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Proposal from the Lowing of the Sales Tax on Luxury Goods |
| Message | Yes, Mr Speaker |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 48 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 102 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
| Random quote: "The radical of one century is the conservative of the next. The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them." - Mark Twain |