We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Strike Act 4731
Details
Submitted by[?]: White Rose
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4731
Description[?]:
| An Act to reform the strike process to allow illegal strikers to be dismissed, but ensure oversight by the Government to protect workers who strike legally |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
Current: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Proposed: Government approval is needed before strikers can be fired.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:09:10, March 25, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Strike Act 4731 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, this proposal is not fair. Please rethink this bill. If the strikers can be fired then we take too much power to the corporations. We need balance between the workers and the corporations. I hope you'll agree with me. If we take too much power to the workers, then we create a communist state without free trade, however if we take too much power to the corporations we create an exploiter system. No one is better than the another. So we want free trade with free strikes. We don't want a free, exploiter trade without strikes. We don't want not free, communist trade with "super" strikes. So we vote "no". Respectfully: Xander Fletcher, the Communication Director and the Temporary Supreme Second-delegate of the Left for Progress. |
| Date | 20:10:42, March 25, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Strike Act 4731 |
| Message | take=give* Sorry. |
| Date | 20:18:33, March 25, 2020 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Strike Act 4731 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, You will note the White Rose is not reforming the legality of strikes, they remain legal if they meet the voting requirements and a minimal services is maintained by key sectors. This bill ensures those who strike illegally, can be sacked, and the Government will provide necesarry oversight between workers and corporations to ensure fairness. |
| Date | 20:28:14, March 25, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Strike Act 4731 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, But if the strike's have consequence then the strike isn't free. And if the strike isn't free then the legality of strikes is just formality. And if the legality of strikes is just formality then the Government give too much power to the corporations. You can refuted this simple fact? Respectfully: Xander Fletcher, the Communication Director and the Temporary Supreme Second-delegate of the Left for Progress. |
| Date | 20:30:19, March 25, 2020 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Strike Act 4731 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The strikes have consequences no matter what, we are ensuring illegal strikes can be met with dismissal. If they have not broken the laws, the employer will not be allowed to sack them. The law is irrefutable, the right to strike exists after a democratic vote, companies can ask the Government to sack those who have gone on illegal strikes, it will be down to Government, not corporations, to decide if that permission is granted, therefore power is not overtly with the corporations. |
| Date | 21:45:20, March 25, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Strike Act 4731 |
| Message | OK. Let's see the thing by another view. If a private-hand corporation don't pay their workers and then that workers have chance to ask help from the government, then the government punish that corporation? Of course not, because that a private-hand corporation. And this is good. But if the government not punish that corporation, then don't punish the strikers in any way. This is the free trade with free strikes. Respectfully: Xander Fletcher, the Communication Director and the Temporary Supreme Second-delegate of the Left for Progress. |
| Date | 22:50:46, March 25, 2020 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Strike Act 4731 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, That is just ... I mean, not surprising, but incredibly lacking knowledge. If a corporation breaks the law, they are punished. Currently, the law protects illegal strikers, we intend to change that so they can be fired. Free trade is about no tariffs, not no rules or laws. |
| Date | 23:49:54, March 25, 2020 CET | From | Left for Progress | To | Debating the Strike Act 4731 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, That is just ... I mean, not surprising, but incredible that you arrogantly attack our knowledge. How can the Government punish a private-hand corporation if that not pay to their workers? Respectfully: Xander Fletcher, the Communication Director and the Temporary Supreme Second-delegate of the Left for Progress. |
| Date | 01:19:42, March 26, 2020 CET | From | White Rose | To | Debating the Strike Act 4731 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, If a company does not pay their workers, they are in breach of contract and can be fined etc. This is a simple measure and one which will mean strikes are legal, but taking strike action outside the law will mean you can be fired. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 78 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 54 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy". |
| Random quote: "The Revolution needs to progress. We as humans need to evolve into higher beings through better moral virtues. And we can achieve that if we clean ourselves from the immoral. Those who go against the Revolution, go against human progress and must be freed in the most humane way possible. That is why we introduced the guillotine." - Maximus Robertson, former Davostani revolutionary |