Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:02:12
Server time: 19:57:47, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Constitutional Reforms

Details

Submitted by[?]: Holy Luthori Church ⚔️

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 4739

Description[?]:

The Cabinet system proposed by the WR/LCP is ridiculus and makes no snes, and is a break with the centriues custom of the Empire.

Article 1

Reject and Repeal the "Members of Cabinet Roles/Line of succession Act (Update)
" [http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=619722]

Article 2

- MoST returns with previous duties, and resumes role as Chairman

- Speaker is elected by Parliament. It is custom, and therefore not legaly binding nor enforceable, that the largest party nominate the Speaker

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:07:40, April 09, 2020 CET
FromWhite Rose
ToDebating the Constitutional Reforms
MessageMr Speaker,

No thank you.

Date03:37:36, April 10, 2020 CET
FromHoly Luthori Church ⚔️
ToDebating the Constitutional Reforms
MessageMr. Speaker,

Why does the CWL vote against this bill?

Perhaps it is because of their goldfish memory, which may be supplemented by memorizing passages from the Holy Scripture.

But until the CWP recites their prayer, I will take the duty of reminding them.

Four years ago, and to the day, in March 4735, the CPL proposed "Restoring the Chairman of the Board of Science and Technology" [http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=619936].

That bill proposed the exact same proposals as this bill.

On that bill, the CWL voted YES.

On this bill the CWL voted NO.

There are only 2 explanations:

the CWL votes randomly on bills, which is unlikely, they may be evil, but we doubt they are insane

OR

the CWL has not received its order from Central Communist Command Council of Comrades in the CPL, to vote yes.
_________

Now some might counter, "is that not the purpose of a Bloc? to unify political forces?"

I respond yes, to UNIFY, not to ENSLAVE.

In the Holy Bloc, parties have been free to vote their WILL, and they have frequently voted aginst HLC measures, a RIGHT they are ENTITLED to and a RIGHT that is UNALIENABLE, because the elector votes for the PARTY, not the Bloc. The Bloc merely attempt to unify the wills of the people to fight for a common cause.

Perphaps the CPL should allow democracy in its own ranks, before it seeks to preach to us about it.




Date08:43:26, April 10, 2020 CET
FromCommon Wealth Party - CWP
ToDebating the Constitutional Reforms
MessageMr Speaker,
We support the issue but we decided to vote against it. Either way, this won't go through, no matter how we vote. And because it is so, we decided to solve it differently (probably in much easier way) and therefore we voted against it. This is not the way to do this.

Date09:51:08, April 10, 2020 CET
FromSocialist Party
ToDebating the Constitutional Reforms
MessageMr. Speaker,
Just this once, we support an HLC proposal. The bill was previsouly passed without us knowing that the Speaker would "replace" the science and technology department. It wasn't like that after the communist revolution.

Date19:24:11, April 10, 2020 CET
FromHoly Luthori Church ⚔️
ToDebating the Constitutional Reforms
MessageMr.Speaker,

I take back my statement " but we [HLC] doubt they [CWP] are insane" , and i recommend the CWP MD's make usage of the free mental health counseling the Diet provides for MD's

"We support the issue but we decided to vote against it."- CWP

We have no further comment to make.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 18

no
      

Total Seats: 132

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated.

Random quote: "Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56