We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Terran Military and Trade Alliance (TMTA)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Kingship Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4801
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Terran Military and Trade Alliance (TMTA). If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Terran Military and Trade Alliance (TMTA).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:32:11, August 13, 2020 CET | From | Beluzian Kingship Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Terran Military and Trade Alliance (TMTA) |
| Message | thoughts from the foreign minister? |
| Date | 10:14:37, August 16, 2020 CET | From | Beluzia Renewal Party (BRP) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Terran Military and Trade Alliance (TMTA) |
| Message | BRP opinion: 1. Of course there is nothing intrinsically to object to in considering the ratification of the proposed treaty. 2. But, we are already signed up to internationally recognised trade and military treaties eg Union Nations of Terra (with Security Council, World Assemblies etc) & a Trade Association and Economic Pact 3. The proposed treaty contains only one article of ratification, relating to the illegality of slavery. Again, we have already ratified the International Rejection of Slavery Agreement. So the treaty's article is completely superfluous to us, and seems rather incongruous in a treaty relating to a trade and military alliance (unless it is attempting to address the issue of trading of slaves, which incidentally the article does not directly prohibit!) The BRP will not object if this treaty is ratified, as its intentions are good and we should support such ideals. However, the BRP has repeatedly in the past appealed to Parliament not to overburden and over-complicate the set of treaties to which we belong, as they do require revisiting from time to time. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 483 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 167 |
| Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
| Random quote: "The one bonus of not lifting the ban on gays in the military is that the next time the government mandates a draft we can all declare homosexuality instead of running off to Canada." - Lorne Bloch |