Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 02:35:35
Server time: 01:24:24, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ChevaldelaMer | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Terran Military and Trade Alliance (TMTA)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Beluzian Kingship Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4801

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Terran Military and Trade Alliance (TMTA). If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:32:11, August 13, 2020 CET
FromBeluzian Kingship Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Terran Military and Trade Alliance (TMTA)
Messagethoughts from the foreign minister?

Date10:14:37, August 16, 2020 CET
FromBeluzia Renewal Party (BRP)
ToDebating the Ratification of the Terran Military and Trade Alliance (TMTA)
MessageBRP opinion:

1. Of course there is nothing intrinsically to object to in considering the ratification of the proposed treaty.

2. But, we are already signed up to internationally recognised trade and military treaties
eg Union Nations of Terra (with Security Council, World Assemblies etc) & a Trade Association and Economic Pact

3. The proposed treaty contains only one article of ratification, relating to the illegality of slavery.
Again, we have already ratified the International Rejection of Slavery Agreement.
So the treaty's article is completely superfluous to us, and seems rather incongruous in a treaty relating to a trade and military alliance (unless it is attempting to address the issue of trading of slaves, which incidentally the article does not directly prohibit!)

The BRP will not object if this treaty is ratified, as its intentions are good and we should support such ideals. However, the BRP has repeatedly in the past appealed to Parliament not to overburden and over-complicate the set of treaties to which we belong, as they do require revisiting from time to time.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
       

    Total Seats: 483

    abstain
          

    Total Seats: 167


    Random fact: Players using inactive accounts and/or accounts from outside nations may only propose bills and/or contribute to discussions, whether IC (in-character) or OOC (out-of-character) with the general consent of the players in the nation.

    Random quote: "Difference of religion breeds more quarrels than difference of politics." - Wendell Phillips

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 43