Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 01:55:32
Server time: 18:04:27, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Debate with the Secretary of State for Education Freddie Bird

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Movement

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 4865

Description[?]:

Mr. the Secretary of State,
Your policies should be aimed at strengthening our education system and helping parents with a free educational system.
Your reforms are not in the interest of the vast majority of the Luthorian people. We have middle-class families that are not very wealthy, in this country. You want to subsidize higher education tuition only for low-income families. How are those middle-class families going to survive if they now have to pay the very expensive costs of higher education for their children. By trying to spare money and reduce inequalities, you are indeed creating new poors. We ask you to reconsider your policies, Mr. the Secretary of State.

The other part of your reform will ban the national anthem from our schools. This is an attack on our nation as a whole. Your anti-national policies are destroying this patriotic spirit in the heart of our children. I don't even understand how the traitorous LCP can support that! You don't like our national anthem, you hate our country, you hate our race. How about, instead of children never made to sing the national anthem, you're never made to sit in this parliament?
When Luthori will be at war, you will be amongst the first one to surrender to the enemy.

You also want to tell teachers how they should discipline the children. That means the Secretary of State for Education is better qualified than our teachers to know how they should act confronted with unruly children. How preposterous is that!
There are many teachers in this country and they'll tell you the same thing.
Teachers have a degree, they have the qualifications, they know better!

We have a recommendation, Mr. Bird, if you want to save money on education. You should stop funding the education of black students. That way you will stop pouring money down the drain.

Boris Clifton-Brown, MP.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:54:39, December 22, 2020 CET
FromDemocratic Party of Luthori (CAL)
ToDebating the Debate with the Secretary of State for Education Freddie Bird
MessageDear Mr MP,

Democratic Party of Luthori has always been opened for critics. However, viewpoint of your party has always been extremist or close to extremists regarding social policies.

As of your critics that middle class will be most affected by our policy, we agree to some extent. However, we think that country shouldn't provide a free education to everyone simple because it's not the best solution. We are doing this in order to protect the most vulnerable ones - the poorest. The remaininf of the budget would be transfered into improving the quality of education. So, thereby we believe this win-win scenario but as you said the biggest economical lossers are probably the middle class families.

As the rest of the critics it is just package of modern and moderate ideology of current Luthori government.

Freddie Bird, the Secretary of State

Date14:54:44, December 22, 2020 CET
FromDemocratic Party of Luthori (CAL)
ToDebating the Debate with the Secretary of State for Education Freddie Bird
MessageDear Mr MP,

Democratic Party of Luthori has always been opened for critics. However, viewpoint of your party has always been extremist or close to extremists regarding social policies.

As of your critics that middle class will be most affected by our policy, we agree to some extent. However, we think that country shouldn't provide a free education to everyone simple because it's not the best solution. We are doing this in order to protect the most vulnerable ones - the poorest. The remaininf of the budget would be transfered into improving the quality of education. So, thereby we believe this win-win scenario but as you said the biggest economical lossers are probably the middle class families.

As the rest of the critics it is just package of modern and moderate ideology of current Luthori government.

Freddie Bird, the Secretary of State

Date19:12:37, December 22, 2020 CET
FromNational Movement
ToDebating the Debate with the Secretary of State for Education Freddie Bird
MessageMr. Bird,
That's what I thought, and you said it yourself. You don't care about the middle class, they are going to pay anyway!
Free education to everyone is of course the best solution because that means everyone has the same chances, since everyone pays taxes.
You're not helping the poorest because they don't receive anything more, they were already protected before.
This is a real shame and we're going to protest, in the streets.

The rest of the package is not "moderate ideology". It is crazy liberal ideology. I repeat, you're a traitor Mr. Bird and the people won't ignore that in the next elections.


Boris Clifton-Brown, MP.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 52

no
    

Total Seats: 98

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass.

Random quote: "An independent is someone who wants to take the politics out of politics." - Adlai Stevenson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 44