We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Policy Towards Weapons in Military
Details
Submitted by[?]: Traditionalist Party of Beluzia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 5003
Description[?]:
The Policy towards the use of land mines in the army |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Current: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards the use of land mines by the army.
Old value:: The use of land mines is prohibited.
Current: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Proposed: The use of land mines is allowed but restricted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:29:59, September 24, 2021 CET | From | Traditionalist Party of Beluzia | To | Debating the The Policy Towards Weapons in Military |
Message | This party is for the strengthening of our military and we shall make immediate changes so that we can become the number one nation on the planet |
Date | 22:35:57, September 24, 2021 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Beluzia | To | Debating the The Policy Towards Weapons in Military |
Message | We vote yes reluctantly, however our party generally would be more satisfied if the government could offer us a guarantee that this does not get abused. Arienne Harrelson, SDP General Spokesperson and Deputy Secretary of the SDP |
Date | 13:48:53, September 25, 2021 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Beluzia | To | Debating the The Policy Towards Weapons in Military |
Message | After an internal party debate, we have decided to vote against this, as it is not feasible for Beluzia to aim to be the number one nation in the world. Rei Shimada, SDP Defence Spokesperson OOC: According to Moderation, Beluzia is a weak power, meaning that any RP of us being the top nation is unrealistic. Here’s a link to the current military rankings: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?p=166034#p166034 |
Date | 14:51:51, September 25, 2021 CET | From | Traditionalist Party of Beluzia | To | Debating the The Policy Towards Weapons in Military |
Message | Why do guys not want to become the strongest country it seems a little un-patriotic |
Date | 16:55:25, September 25, 2021 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the The Policy Towards Weapons in Military |
Message | National strength does not always have to be shown through our military, it can be shown economically, politically, environmentally and socially. Furthermore, political parties have different opinions regarding the military just because they are voting No or opposing it does not mean they are unpatriotic |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 257 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 393 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
Random quote: "He who turns his back on the left, looks at the right." - Johan Vande Lanotte |