We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private members' bill: Bill's bill 3
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 5007
Description[?]:
Another bill from Bill. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The banking system.
Old value:: The government operates large, national banks, but small community based private banks are allowed.
Current: All banks are privately owned.
Proposed: All banks are privately owned.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: Certain industries are owned by the state, all others are under private ownership.
Current: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Proposed: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The education system.
Old value:: Education is entirely public and free; private schools are banned.
Current: There is a free public education system alongside private schools.
Proposed: Education is a matter of local governments.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Public executions (if death penalty is legal).
Old value:: Executions are always carried out in private; however, family members, the victim and the victim's relatives are allowed to be present.
Current: Executions are always carried out in private; however, family members, the victim and the victim's relatives are allowed to be present.
Proposed: Local government decide the legality of public executions.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Policy concerning racial segregation in educational institutions.
Old value:: Segregation is illegal in all educational institutions.
Current: Segregation is illegal in all educational institutions.
Proposed: Segregation policy is set by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:10:04, October 01, 2021 CET | From | Luthorian Progressive Party | To | Debating the Private members' bill: Bill's bill 3 |
Message | OOC: Suspicious that one of Luthori’s economic far-left, as most people would say, parties, would endorse private ownership. |
Date | 12:31:51, October 01, 2021 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Private members' bill: Bill's bill 3 |
Message | OOC: Bill is an accelerationist. |
Date | 17:17:24, October 01, 2021 CET | From | Luthorian Progressive Party | To | Debating the Private members' bill: Bill's bill 3 |
Message | Even though the party backs proposals 1 and 3, we see proposal 5 as too risky to consider. OOC: Don’t accelerationists like giving subsidies to industry if it develops society in their view? |
Date | 19:27:23, October 01, 2021 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Private members' bill: Bill's bill 3 |
Message | "The Communist willingness to accept segregation proves just how much of a sham their conversion to social liberalism was," says Bill. "But we thank them for their votes nonetheless." |
Date | 01:19:55, October 02, 2021 CET | From | Liberal Party | To | Debating the Private members' bill: Bill's bill 3 |
Message | Mr. Speaker, Although we don't agree with everything in the bill, we welcome Bill's proposition, supported by the LSP, to devolve education to local governments and to liberalise our economy. Eva Longham, MP. |
Date | 01:28:24, October 02, 2021 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Private members' bill: Bill's bill 3 |
Message | Bill is overjoyed by the success of his bill. He dies from a heart attack that night out of excitement. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 187 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 83 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 30 |
Random fact: "Jezvraljogadsrlji" means "Social" in the Jelbic languages. |
Random quote: As for rape, of course, that is a direct consequence of the capitalist system of oppression. Capitalism relies on fuelling division and resentment to sustain itself, and so it sets men against women, race against race and so on. Men rape women because they are being oppressed by capitalism, so they take it out on women. Under Communism, there will be no rape, because there will be a full and natural harmony and equality between the genders. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |