We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 5029
Details
Submitted by[?]: Taylor's Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 5030
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Taylor's Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Taylor's Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Progressive People's Party of Beluzia
Article 4
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Taylor's Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Progressive People's Party of Beluzia
Article 6
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Progressive People's Party of Beluzia
Article 7
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Progressive People's Party of Beluzia
Article 8
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Progressive People's Party of Beluzia
Article 9
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Taylor's Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Taylor's Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Progressive People's Party of Beluzia
Article 12
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Taylor's Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Taylor's Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:00:55, November 16, 2021 CET | From | Taylor's Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 5029 |
| Message | Given the fact that the other parties are not on board with the other proposal, we will be proposing a new cabinet to fulfil our mandate. |
| Date | 05:23:16, November 16, 2021 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 5029 |
| Message | Just because I abstained does not mean I am unwilling to cooperate as I made clear. I have shown no antagonism whatsoever personally just think other parties should have had a say before the proposal was put to a vote |
| Date | 05:24:58, November 16, 2021 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 5029 |
| Message | I supported the previous proposal up to the point the SFP voted against so changing my position shouldn't warrant exclusion |
| Date | 05:27:02, November 16, 2021 CET | From | Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 5029 |
| Message | OOC: Would be great if you could clear things up so that there's no big arguments because after all it's just a game. Don't wanna fall out with anyone |
| Date | 14:37:43, November 16, 2021 CET | From | Traditionalist Party of Beluzia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 5029 |
| Message | This cabinet goes against the republics fair cabinets therefore we must vote no |
| Date | 14:43:09, November 16, 2021 CET | From | Traditionalist Party of Beluzia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 5029 |
| Message | 1. Largest party should be the Head of the Government 2. Second Largest party should be Foreign Minister 3. Positions in the cabinet should be distributed by their seats. (Example: 162/750 * 13 = 2.8 (approx.) that means progressive should get 3 Ministerial Seats) 4. Fair distribution of the positions. Just because a party gets 2 ministerial seats don't give them the last two positions. -This was submitted to us from the PPPB, this is the most fair, so each of these parties should have at least 2 seats, and the fact that none of the parties have two seats or three seats, taylor's party should be 4, PPPB, 3, UBWP, 2, TPB, 2,SFP, 2, this would be the most fair cabinet that would be proposed, so we must oppose |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 236 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 395 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 119 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "Presidency, n. The greased pig in the field game of American politics." - Ambrose Bierce |