We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: The Progressive Freedom Program - The End of the Video Games Censorship
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 5104
Description[?]:
| The government's policy regarding regulation of video games. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding regulation of video games.
Old value:: Video games are prohibited, except those that pass strict government content ratings.
Current: The government does not maintain laws as to age limitation for purchasing video games, although it does require a content rating to be clearly displayed on the box.
Proposed: The government does not maintain laws as to age limitation for purchasing video games, although it does require a content rating to be clearly displayed on the box.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:45:53, April 06, 2022 CET | From | Socialist People's Party | To | Debating the The Progressive Freedom Program - The End of the Video Games Censorship |
| Message | Video games cause crime rates to rise. If the Govt wants blood on its hand, then they are free to proceed |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 200 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 100 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "Whenever a separation is made between liberty and justice, neither, in my opinion, is safe." - Edmund Burke |