We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Call for early elections, May 5112

Details

Submitted by^[?]: The Federal Whig Party

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.

Voting deadline: March 5113

Description^[?]:

We, the Federalism Today, Tomorrow, Forever, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. This is largely due to the Federalists doubting the ability of the Liberals to function due to abstaining from the Cabinet vote.

Proposals

Article 1

Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	08:53:18, May 01, 2022 CET
From	Andrew Brooks' Democratic Union Movement
To	Debating the Call for early elections, May 5112
Message	We will be supporting this.

Date	16:27:25, May 01, 2022 CET
From	Andrew Brooks' Democratic Union Movement
To	Debating the Call for early elections, May 5112
Message	We encourage all parties to vote for this as as the largest party cannot sit around doing nothing.

Date	17:01:05, May 01, 2022 CET
From	Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
To	Debating the Call for early elections, May 5112
Message	OOC: To be honest if they haven't logged on for days it doesn't really warrant an early election motion and also why continue sticking with the same coalition there are two other parties that haven't been in govt for quite a long time

Date	17:38:06, May 01, 2022 CET
From	The Federal Whig Party
To	Debating the Call for early elections, May 5112
Message	OOC: The other two parties haven't exactly been able to form a government, have they? And the Libs tend to stay away until just before they would be auto deleted for inactivity.

Date	18:35:01, May 01, 2022 CET
From	Andrew Brooks' Democratic Union Movement
To	Debating the Call for early elections, May 5112
Message	OOC: Adding to that, they can be inactivated under Section 5, Rule 3b, which I did try to do a while ago.

Date	02:22:27, May 02, 2022 CET
From	Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
To	Debating the Call for early elections, May 5112
Message	OOC: Other two parties haven't been able to form a government but you could have at least reached out to us

Date	02:49:37, May 02, 2022 CET
From	The Federal Whig Party
To	Debating the Call for early elections, May 5112
Message	OOC: And vice versa.

Date	03:56:39, May 02, 2022 CET
From	Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party
To	Debating the Call for early elections, May 5112
Message	OOC: Well government formation doesn't really require both sides to reach out. Surely you must have assumed that after so many years in opposition that naturally we would want to be part of govt

Date	12:15:24, May 02, 2022 CET
From	The Federal Whig Party
To	Debating the Call for early elections, May 5112
Message	No, because I tend to not make assumptions here.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Traditionalist Movement (117)
Progressive People's Party of Beluzia (116)
The Federal Whig Party (115)
Andrew Brooks' Democratic Union Movement (113)

Total Seats: 461

Total Seats: 0

abstain

Liberal Party (176)
Unsubmissive Beluzian Workers Party (113)
Beluzia Democratic Party (0)
AmokWater Party (0)

Total Seats: 289

Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

Random quote: "Plans to protect air and water, wilderness and wildlife are in fact plans to protect man." - Stewart Udall

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55