We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Gambling Compromise
Details
Submitted by[?]: Zuman Independence Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2069
Description[?]:
| The legality of gambling is to be deceided by local governments. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to gamble.
Old value:: Gambling is legal across the nation, no regulation whatsoever.
Current: Only small-scale gambling is allowed, involving limited amounts of money; casinos are illegal.
Proposed: The legality of gambling is a matter of local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:33:34, June 19, 2005 CET | From |  Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | Gambling creates inequality. |
| Date | 13:35:27, June 19, 2005 CET | From | Restoration Party | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | ??? Where did this come from...Nei from us! |
| Date | 15:18:47, June 19, 2005 CET | From | Deadly Buzz Party | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | No |
| Date | 15:57:56, June 19, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | We concur with the point so plainly put by the DBP above. |
| Date | 16:32:15, June 19, 2005 CET | From | Zuman Independence Party | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | Since you all are pets of the rich, we will try to make a compromise. |
| Date | 16:36:05, June 19, 2005 CET | From | Deadly Buzz Party | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | Lol |
| Date | 16:40:04, June 19, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberty Party | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | As the proponents of the change now trying to be reversed...we must vote no. -Cliff Newsted, SLP Chairman |
| Date | 18:24:10, June 19, 2005 CET | From |  Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | @TCP: The lib dems started out as a merchant faction, I wouldn't call us pets, but the rich themselves :) |
| Date | 21:45:27, June 19, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | Hehe. As the new Anarchist party, we have to vote yes. But yeah, we liked it the way it was before anyways. |
| Date | 23:24:48, June 19, 2005 CET | From | Restoration Party | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | we introduced this some time ago, so we agree! |
| Date | 04:02:36, June 20, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Valruzia | To | Debating the Gambling Compromise |
| Message | I don't care, I'm just going to vote for both anytime anyway. might as well abstain next time.. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 102 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 73 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: "There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America." - Bill Clinton |