Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 00:05:03
Server time: 03:54:56, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Siffrin | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Manche Year Zero

Details

Submitted by[?]: Manche Movement

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2232

Description[?]:

The Manche Movement has been swept into power with the overwhelming support of the masses. The time of Manche is at hand, and Sekowo shall be remade according to the teachings.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:44:30, May 23, 2006 CET
From People's Liberation Army
ToDebating the Manche Year Zero
MessageWith a close debate, 5 articles we agree with to 6 articles we disagree, we must vote no.

Date16:47:49, May 23, 2006 CET
From Ministerial Party
ToDebating the Manche Year Zero
MessageChrist this is awful.

Date19:37:24, May 23, 2006 CET
From Cruzada Tradicionalista Sekowana
ToDebating the Manche Year Zero
MessageWe agree with Articles 1 and 4, but not with any vehemence. We seriously disagree with Articles 3,5 and 10.
* We support limited copy protection.
* We support government subsidies for independent non profit making cooperatives for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations should be allowed. Total socialization of broadcasting is opposed to the principle of free speech.
* We would like to see regulation of private health-care clinics. We oppose banning them.
* We could support putting illegal aliens in integration centers or allowing local governments to deal with them. Preferably the latter. But we don't see a compelling reason to change the current set-up.
* We would be happy to limit intelligence services to counterintelligence and surveillance of other countries. We can not support the complete abdication of intelligence services.
* We would like to see the government encourage the formation of Democratic Workers' Councils through subsidies and tax exemptions.

These are the only items our party would be willing to debate. Otherwise, we can not in good conscience, or any conscience for that matter, vote in favor of this measure. If the Ministerial Party is what we suspect it to be, we really hate agreeing with them :)

Date05:12:31, May 24, 2006 CET
From Manche Movement
ToDebating the Manche Year Zero
MessageSorry about this but I feel the need to abuse my power, just a little.

Date10:01:50, May 24, 2006 CET
From Cruzada Tradicionalista Sekowana
ToDebating the Manche Year Zero
MessageThis looks like the Sekowan Enabling Acts. Gives us something to fix later, when power is more evenly distributed.

Date06:35:38, June 13, 2006 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Manche Year Zero
Messagehttp://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=48059
At least you didn't end up with THIS.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 469

no
    

Total Seats: 256

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 117