We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: More television freedom
Details
Submitted by[?]: Drake Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2234
Description[?]:
While the Drake Party oposes sexually explicit content that children may view, we support freedom to do as one wishes as long as it does not infringe upon another. No one forces children to watch this content. Parent already have the option with v-chips to block objectionable content. Therefore we believe that broadcasting this material does not infringe on anyone elses rights and should be legal. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The time at which sexually explicit content may be shown on broadcast television (if allowed).
Old value:: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Current: Sexually explicit content may only be shown during hours that very few children watch. Nudity may be shown all day long.
Proposed: Sexually explicit content may be shown all day long.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:50:40, May 26, 2006 CET | From | Cruzada Tradicionalista Sekowana | To | Debating the More television freedom |
Message | This is a big meh. More important is the problem of government control of the media. I'd flip a coin on this one. |
Date | 02:56:30, May 27, 2006 CET | From | People's Liberation Army | To | Debating the More television freedom |
Message | We disagree with this proposal. There needs to be a benchmark for Sekowan media. If we let them show sexually explicit content, as time goes by what may seem borderline acceptable now will devolve into largely unacceptable broadcasts in the future. |
Date | 08:45:13, May 28, 2006 CET | From | Cruzada Tradicionalista Sekowana | To | Debating the More television freedom |
Message | ooc*: We're going with yes. Let our Manche friends decide this one. *ooc, because ic there isn't much friendly between our parties right now. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 267 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 80 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 378 |
Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current. |
Random quote: "The main problem of the left is that it has been traditionally divided and unable to reach agreements between different leftist views, whilst the right has almost always moved in the same direction by giving concessions to different rightist points of view." - Aelius Celer, former Selucian politician |