We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to privacy (Part 2)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lotus Coalition of the Endless Knot
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2237
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:04:33, June 02, 2006 CET | From |  Christian Democrats | To | Debating the Right to privacy (Part 2) |
| Message | "Are there any circumstances under which the AMSSM thinks Justice should subpeona the contents of someone's letters?" -- Bovalin Custer, Minister of Justice |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 18 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 73 | ||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 29 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky |