We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence Industry Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian Democrats
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2241
Description[?]:
"Our nation nationalised some defence industries, and it is my belief that this was done in error. No significant benefit emerged as a result of that decision, so let's reverse it." -- Alistair Armand, Minister of Defence |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:34:06, June 09, 2006 CET | From | Democratic Industrialists | To | Debating the Defence Industry Reform |
Message | We agree wholeheartedly. This allows for more commercial opportunities. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 64 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 19 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 37 |
Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
Random quote: "The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." - Aristotle |