We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: UF NPP (with UFP support) Cabinet
Details
Submitted by[?]: Unionist Front (⚔️)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 5218
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Unionist Front (⚔️)
Article 2
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Unionist Front (⚔️)
Article 3
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the National Progress Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the United Future Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Unionist Front (⚔️)
Article 6
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the National Progress Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the United Future Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the National Progress Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the National Progress Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the National Progress Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the National Progress Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the National Progress Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the United Future Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:32:25, November 28, 2022 CET | From | Unionist Front (⚔️) | To | Debating the UF NPP (with UFP support) Cabinet |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, This proposal is a unity proposal between the UF and the NPP. We have also included the UFP, which will increase the stability of the coalition. This will give us almost 200 seats, abd thus provide a cabinet that truely represents the all segments of Hutori society. UF |
| Date | 22:48:02, November 28, 2022 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party of Hutori | To | Debating the UF NPP (with UFP support) Cabinet |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The UF's proposals here smell of desperation and frankly wreek of pettiness. We offered a proposal that would have given 7/14 seats at the cabinet table to the UF, far higher than their proportion of Senate seats. Our offer was deemed "absurd" by that party. We know the UF and NPP have a long history of, what can only be described as, hatred toward each other. If this was the sole concern, we could understand the hesitation. However, our proposal would have ensured neither party would have to serve under the Premiership of the other party. Yes, Progressive Conservatives, as the second smallest party, would have held the premiership, but we asked for no other seat at the table. Mr. Speaker, Progressive Conservatives extended an olive branch and the UF snapped that branch straight in half. I would recommend that when the UF ultimately fails to win a majority once again next month, they don't come crawling to us for coalition support. Hon. Martin Bezan Senator for Tremaine—Interlake—Eastman Leader of the Progressive Conservative Party |
| Date | 00:15:29, November 29, 2022 CET | From | Unionist Front (⚔️) | To | Debating the UF NPP (with UFP support) Cabinet |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The party with less than 20 seats can hardly be entrusted with the mandate of leading a government. We did not snap the branch in half, we proposed 3 cabinets that would have given majority of cabinet seats to other parties to ensure that we get a deal. The PCPH simply wanted to be play kingmaker and be given Premiership and recognized as the arbitrator holding the 2 parties together. The attempt to frame it as anything else is what is truely absurd. A genuine offer would have only included the 2 parties with Premiership given to the UF (as largest party) or NPP (since UF already have HoS). It makes no sense for PCPH to be the glue that sticks the 2 parties together and that it be placed at the Head of Government. True the NPP and UF are not political allies. But when push comes to shove we have worked together for the sake of Hutori, and I believe we would continue to do so no matter our differences. Appetantly the PCPH believes any party will win a majority. This will not happen. The balance of power will remain hung on parties putting aside differences and working together to achieve a majority. It's the basics of Parliamentary democracy and how Hutori has operated for centuries. The UF will continue to work towards uniting Hutori as a nation first, and we will not rule out working with any party the people of Hutori entrust with heir votes in order to achieve a stable government. We will reach out to the PCPH after the elections because we will need to work together. If not for the sake of our parties, for the sake of Hutori and her future generations. I hope the Torries will change their mind and when push comes to shove put the interests of the nation above thier own. Long Live Hutori UF |
| Date | 01:45:42, November 29, 2022 CET | From | Unionist Front (⚔️) | To | Debating the UF NPP (with UFP support) Cabinet |
| Message | Ooc archive |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 283 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 22 |
| Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules. |
| Random quote: "Casting a vote shouldn't make you sick." - Ronnie Dugger |