Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:20:22
Server time: 19:39:37, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AR Drax | itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: IFP religious initiative: soft approach

Details

Submitted by[?]: Ikradonian Faith Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2241

Description[?]:

We withhold two articles of our doomed-to-be-voted-down religious package and hope the Assembly will at least agree to these two provisions.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:35:38, June 09, 2006 CET
FromZapatista Freedom Party
ToDebating the IFP religious initiative: soft approach
MessageNo to 1.

Date00:41:32, June 10, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the IFP religious initiative: soft approach
MessageWe find this bill to be agreeable and will vote in favour.

Date03:55:52, June 10, 2006 CET
FromIqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi
ToDebating the IFP religious initiative: soft approach
MessageThe IPC, assembled in Congress, voted on whether to support this bill. While a significant faction opposed the anti-cloning provision, this faction did not carry the day. The supporters of the bill in the IPC are mostly ambivalent on the cloning issue. In accordance with the resolution of the Congress, all IPC legislators will support this bill.

Date04:48:20, June 14, 2006 CET
FromLyika ati Isọdọtun
ToDebating the IFP religious initiative: soft approach
MessageWe support the continuation of cloning research, and we believe it is appropriate to require public officials to refrain from wearing religious symbols while exercising state duties. Insofar as such officials are representatives of the state, they should present the state as the secular entity which it is. When they are off-duty, they are free to present themselves as they see fit.

Date12:38:28, June 14, 2006 CET
FromZapatista Freedom Party
ToDebating the IFP religious initiative: soft approach
MessageLet it be known we do not support one, but feel article 2 is more important, thus we have voted in afavour overall. We will set about trying to fix the passed article 1.

Date21:47:30, June 14, 2006 CET
FromLiberal Conservative
ToDebating the IFP religious initiative: soft approach
MessageI believe human cloning or least the resulting research and medical benefits make banning it a shortsighted measure, as much could be learned. However I am in favour of allowing religious symbols and clothing to be worn by public officials as religion does not define who you are or necessarily how you carry out your job. I myself am an atheist but an neither threatened nor offended by the demonstration of faith, especially in the harmless wearing of religious clothing.

I would recommend voting on these issues separately as they have nothing to do with each other and I expect that many people would have support of one and not the other.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 314

no
   

Total Seats: 249

abstain
  

Total Seats: 36


Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453

Random quote: "The streets are safe in Philadelphia, it's only the people who make them unsafe." - Frank Rizzo

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72