We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RDL bill 39: Endangered Animals Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Liberal Democrats (🔥)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 5248
Description[?]:
| Members of the Senate, We should protect endangered animals at all times. I will stimulate special programs to protect these animals in the wild, Thank you, Silvie Rusterhood Minister of Environment |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of endangered animals.
Old value:: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep endangered animals; all other forms of keeping or trading in endangered animals are forbidden.
Current: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep endangered animals; all other forms of keeping or trading in endangered animals are forbidden.
Proposed: Keeping endangered animals, or trading therein, is forbidden.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:59:53, January 28, 2023 CET | From | National Progress Party | To | Debating the RDL bill 39: Endangered Animals Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, If anything, this bill will harm our capacity to protect endangered animals. Zoological institution can provide a safe refuge for endangered animals while they are not ready to be released into the wild. By banning zoological institution form keeping and protecting these animals we denies ourselves a crucial safety net that can ensure us to better protect our wildlife. -George Humpfrey Chairman of the National Progress Party Senator for Acton Don Valley West |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 153 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 270 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 82 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes." - Winston Churchill |