Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 02:36:55
Server time: 05:23:04, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: reduction on contraception bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2072

Description[?]:

Why would the state carry the whole cost of contraceptives? A reduction should be sufficient.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:11:09, June 23, 2005 CET
FromWorkers Democratic Union
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageNo

Date14:58:03, June 23, 2005 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageTo halt the spread of sexually transmitted disease, that's why.

Date16:19:35, June 23, 2005 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageI think we should have free contraceptives because although it would be good if we didn't have to, the alternative (STDs etc) is worse. This is the lesser of two evils from a Social Conservative perspective.

Date20:02:21, June 23, 2005 CET
FromSocial Conservative Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageHey, I'm not trieing to make contraceptives illegal, I'm not even making people to pay for it by themselves.

If free contraceptives are that logic, than why doesn't ANY state (as far as I know) provide them?

Why would it be impossible to have the people take up some responsibility as well?

Date22:19:21, June 23, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageSCP I am with you. I would go further on leaving it without any subsidies!

Anyone participating in health care system already could have contraception prescribed by doctor and paid from the health care system.

Why is contraception different from allergic illnesses or anything else?

Current status is stupid, but there is no political will to move on.

Date22:20:01, June 23, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageWe must bring order to this country wasting money.

Date23:36:52, June 23, 2005 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageNo.

Date01:17:16, June 24, 2005 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageWhat money? ;-)

Date16:24:16, June 24, 2005 CET
FromSocial Conservative Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageWhat money? In that case: what environment? Why have all this "green" legislation? In fact, why have a green party at all?

Date17:16:35, June 24, 2005 CET
FromFree Democratic Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageOOC: Why have a game at all in that case? Aloria doesn't exist!

Date17:49:29, June 24, 2005 CET
From Aloria Green Socialist Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
Message\0/

Still against. Probably more so now.

Date18:03:23, June 24, 2005 CET
FromSocial Conservative Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageFDP: exactly my point.

Date18:36:13, June 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
Messagewait until economic system is here, aloria will deeply in its own shit

Date18:36:22, June 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
Message...will be deeply...

Date20:22:21, June 24, 2005 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
Message*cough* RESET *cough*

And there currently isn't really enough legislation to do enough to do that - I'm sure there will be room for "leveling out."

Date00:00:53, June 25, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageWhat about the poor? Why shan't we afford them protection when they need it?

Date05:52:22, June 25, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageCan we bring this to a vote?

Date11:12:37, June 25, 2005 CET
FromSocial Conservative Party
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
MessageThe poor also profit from the reduction that still stands in this bill. Next to that, the poor should be granted a minimum general income. That way they can choose themselves what to spend their money on. Only providing free stuff means the state is dictating what poor people can obtain.

Date22:35:28, June 25, 2005 CET
From Neoliberal Conservatives
ToDebating the reduction on contraception bill
Messagewe supoprt the Social Conservative party

It is important in our opinion that people have responsibility.. becuase freedom and responsibility are intertwined,

this should however be done with changes, our educational bodies should be given the tools to be able to provide better education, becuase contraseptives only supplied in the form of a Condom can infact prevent most STD's we feel that the state carrying the burden for all known contraseptives is out of sink with the general free market attitude we like to persue...

our solution: Provide Condoms and better education -

cut the costs un un-necesary and over-used forms of contraseption

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 57

no
      

Total Seats: 273

abstain
  

Total Seats: 70


Random fact: Periodically, it is a good idea to go through your nation's Treaties and arrange to withdraw from any that are unwanted.

Random quote: "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." - John Adams

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 95