Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:39:44
Server time: 20:20:15, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AR Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Keymon Defense Initiative

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party for National Reform and Freedom

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2254

Description[?]:

To expand the influence and scope of the keymon defense initiative the PNRF propose the following.

New construction of buildings are required to have provisions for civil defense.
- This is a self funding project as it imposes legislation on construction and is not government funded.
- With the high level of investment into Keymon economy new buildings are known to sprout of the ground like ... sprouts.
- Harnessing this investment into the economy to include defense provisions will allow the government to improve its national defense at no cost to the government. It is imperative to increase defense due to recent regional instability.

The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
- It is niave to assume that an intelligence agency doesn't already undertake all types of illegal covert operations overseas, why not just make it policy and legitamize those actions.
- These actions of course would be under the neutrality agreements and only operate when a direct threat to Keymon is presented.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:26:31, July 13, 2006 CET
FromParty for National Reform and Freedom
ToDebating the Keymon Defense Initiative
Message"Threats have been uncovered in neighbouring and purportedly friendly nations. This is unacceptable, and something we should of had investigated ourselves and been prepared for. Our failure in this is a failure in our policy and we must step up efforts to find information about these threats. Beyond that we must be capacitated to disarm these threats before they reach our borders.

Involvement in another country when it concenrs our own saftey is not a breach of neutrality. This is the most important point."

--- Frank T. Robinson

Date08:04:05, July 13, 2006 CET
FromChristian Democrats
ToDebating the Keymon Defense Initiative
Message"We may consider article one, however article two constitutes a violation of our neutrality. Any operations we might feel necessary would fall under the category of counterintelligence anyway."

-- Director General Jaques Phargle

Date08:29:37, July 13, 2006 CET
FromKeymon Green Party
ToDebating the Keymon Defense Initiative
MessageWe feel the proposal as a whole is well thought out. Given our scarce military budget, we need to do what we can to protect ourselves.

Date09:34:06, July 13, 2006 CET
FromParty for National Reform and Freedom
ToDebating the Keymon Defense Initiative
Message"Counterintelligence is : The branch of an intelligence service charged with keeping sensitive information from an enemy, deceiving that enemy, preventing subversion and sabotage, and collecting political and military information.

This does not capictate our intelligence agency to intervene into matters of national security. The proposed legislation would capacitate the agents to perform sabotage on targets to ensure they are not a danger to Keymon. This would include such measures as disabling an enemies ability to attack Keymon if such an attack is imminent."

Date21:22:39, July 13, 2006 CET
FromFig Party
ToDebating the Keymon Defense Initiative
MessageI am the opposite of the CD's I want to keep #2 and get rid of #1. But I will vote for it to try and get number 2 then change 1 later.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 34

no
   

Total Seats: 59

abstain
 

Total Seats: 24


Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum.

Random quote: "History is made by angry minorities, not by passive majorities." - Fareed Zakaria

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 66