Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 02:02:53
Server time: 05:57:06, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): gattus | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Anthem, revised

Details

Submitted by[?]: Free Reform Coalition (FRP)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2073

Description[?]:

same as previous, but up for changes

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:13:52, June 26, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
Messagewe support keeping "the gods" in the anthem becuase they refer to the ancient gods, which are not currently worshipped but considered more a part of lore and mysticism.

but we would consider changing it to "the hammer of THE STORM drove our ships to our new lands" which is still appropriate.

as for making the anthem a musical piece only, it is perfectly alright if the levp wants to just hum along to the music.

Date20:21:58, June 26, 2005 CET
FromSocial Republican Party
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
MessageWe agree, change it to the storm.

Date20:22:02, June 26, 2005 CET
FromSocial Republican Party
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
MessageWe agree. Also, the main reason it failed was the LibCom Abstaining from the vote.

Date11:01:42, June 27, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
Messageah yeah, was the Libcom absent from the assembly during the entire 8 months or objected to the anthem in some way?

If the libcom objects please say so, we would like to create an anthem we would all like to sing or humm

Date11:06:59, June 27, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
Messagedone, changed the lyrics from "the gods" to "the storm" which fits with the imagery perfectly well.

as a compromise, we would like to keep the war reference (something levp pointed out as something that ought to be removed) becuase it fits with the imagery of the storm and the calming of the tides fits well with the war imagery too.

but if levp has a better idea, that would be great and we could use that instead.

Date14:53:10, June 27, 2005 CET
FromLeviathan Party
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
MessageOur better idea has already been stated: no words.

Date15:42:35, June 27, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
Messagewould the levp like to compose the music, perhaps we could publish the music as our anthem?

Date15:43:39, June 27, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
Messagealso, i think the general concensus is that we want some words in our anthem, so if you would be willing to take the step towards that, maybe we could meet in the middle about the words to the song.

Date21:27:52, June 27, 2005 CET
FromSocial Republican Party
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
MessageWhats so great about no words?

Date11:20:55, June 28, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
Messageexactly, some of the best anthems have words.

ooc: we think the levp is a secret supporter of the impending dolphin invasion and so is paving the way for a national anthem with only clicks and squeeks.

Date12:46:00, June 28, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
Messageokay since no one has added anything more, let put it up to vote.

Date00:15:53, June 29, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
Messageeveryone vote please!

Date04:10:39, June 29, 2005 CET
FromSocial Republican Party
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
MessageLabour party, your objection is?

Date11:51:05, June 29, 2005 CET
FromLibCom Party
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
MessageOkay, this seems innocuous enough. We see no reason to oppose, although we do like the sound of squeaks and clicks.

Date13:49:06, June 29, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the National Anthem, revised
Messageaha! A pawn of the Dolphin Oppressor!

ooc: J/K

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 76

no
  

Total Seats: 24

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "Democrats couldn't care less if people in Indiana hate them. But if Europeans curl their lips, liberals can't look at themselves in the mirror." - Ann Coulter

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68